Grantsmanship for Qualitative and Mixed Methods Proposal

AACS Applied U2 minutes read

The webinar sponsored by Bentley University and the Association for Applied Clinical Sociology, hosted by Gary David, features Dr. Karen Albright discussing qualitative and mixed methods in grants writing, emphasizing the importance of establishing relationships with Project Officers and understanding funding mechanisms. Dr. Albright's expertise in grantsmanship, securing over $21 million in funding, informs the discussion on basic grantsmanship considerations, qualitative budget considerations, and mixed methods research, highlighting the need for a clear rationale for method selection and explaining the purpose of chosen methods in grant proposals.

Insights

  • Dr. Karen Albright, an expert in qualitative and mixed methodologies, will discuss essential aspects of grants writing, including basic considerations, budgeting, and mixed methods research.
  • Successful grant applications require a clear problem definition, detailed research design, and alignment of research questions with chosen methods, emphasizing the importance of establishing relationships with funding agencies and addressing potential biases in qualitative research.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is the topic of the upcoming webinar?

    Qualitative and mixed methods in grants writing.

  • Who will be hosting the webinar?

    Gary David.

  • What are some past webinar topics?

    Crafting sociological brand and sociology for experience design.

  • How can I access the recorded webinars?

    ACS Applied YouTube site.

  • What is the focus of Dr. Karen Albright's expertise?

    Qualitative and mixed methodologies.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

"Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Grants Writing"

  • The webinar is sponsored by Bentley University and the Association for Applied Clinical Sociology, with Gary David as the host.
  • Dr. Karen Albright from the University of Denver and Lacunae Analytics is discussing qualitative and mixed methods in grants writing.
  • The webinar is based on a professional development workshop held at the 2018 ACS annual meeting.
  • Questions can be asked during the webinar, with a focus on addressing them at the end.
  • The webinar is being recorded and will be uploaded to the ACS Applied YouTube site.
  • Past webinars include topics like crafting sociological brand and sociology for experience design.
  • The next webinar will be on February 25th with Dr. Jonathan White discussing social entrepreneurship.
  • Dr. Albright is a sociologist and health services researcher with expertise in qualitative and mixed methodologies.
  • She has extensive grantsmanship experience, securing over $21 million in funding for projects.
  • The webinar will cover basic grantsmanship considerations, qualitative focus, qualitative budget considerations, and mixed methods research.

17:38

Funding Sources and Strategies for Research Grants

  • Various organizations fund social scientific research, such as the American Sociological Association and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
  • Internal institutional funding opportunities exist within academic institutions, offering smaller awards with specific deliverables.
  • Examples of internal institutional funding include the University of Denver's POSS grant and the University of Colorado Medical Campus' CCTSI community engagement awards.
  • The VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiatives provide larger funding opportunities, typically around $100,000.
  • Understanding funding mechanisms is crucial for successful grant applications, including adhering to specific formats and following review criteria.
  • It is essential to establish relationships with Project Officers and understand the composition of study sections for federal agencies.
  • Qualitative researchers should ensure that the agency and funding mechanism are receptive to qualitative data.
  • Research questions must align with the chosen method, and limitations should be openly addressed in grant proposals.
  • Elements of a research design include study purpose, population selection, data collection and analysis methods, data management plan, quality assurance, project administration, and limitations.
  • Clarity in defining the problem, design, population, methods, location, and schedule is crucial for successful grant proposals.

34:52

Essentials of Qualitative Research Methods

  • Qualitative research methods require detailed descriptions of data management and collection methods.
  • Potential bias in qualitative research must be addressed by explaining the setting, participants, and events to be studied.
  • Qualitative studies aim to observe specific phenomena of interest with a smaller sample size, necessitating a focus on maximizing bias.
  • Reviewers expect proposals to outline the sample size needed for identifying themes and answering research questions.
  • Theoretical or purposeful sampling is preferred in qualitative research to achieve thematic saturation.
  • Techniques like triangulation and peer debriefings enhance the trustworthiness of qualitative research accounts.
  • An analysis plan should allow for sample generation and analysis to occur simultaneously until saturation is reached.
  • Qualitative research projects are well-suited for innovation when little is known about a topic, emphasizing the need for originality.
  • Investigator teams in qualitative research should be multidisciplinary, experienced, and trained in various methods.
  • The research environment should support qualitative projects with collaborative relationships, tech support, and familiarity with qualitative software.

51:56

Selecting and Combining Methods for Research

  • Clear rationale for method selection: Reviewers should understand the reasoning behind the order and combination of methods used, whether simultaneous or sequential, with a focus on operationalizing primary methods.
  • Purpose of methods and combination: It is crucial to clarify the purpose of the methods chosen, whether they aim to answer the same or related questions, emphasizing the need for a coherent rationale.
  • Mixed method design typology: Different designs, such as convergent parallel, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and multi-phase, offer varied approaches to collecting and merging quantitative and qualitative data.
  • Barriers to using mixed methods: Challenges include limited training in qualitative methods, lack of collaboration opportunities, and the importance of selecting the most appropriate design to address research questions effectively, emphasizing the need for a coherent and defensible rationale.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.