Medieval Weapons vs The Modern Warrior (How Lethal Are Medieval Weapons ???)
Kentucky Ballistics・2 minutes read
Medieval weapons prove to be lethal but ineffective against modern armor and technology, as demonstrated by Scott from Kentucky Ballistics. Despite showcasing their impact on unarmored targets, medieval weapons are no match for modern weaponry in today's combat scenarios.
Insights
- Medieval weapons like the "spiky scepter" and the spiky ball on a chain showcase significant lethality but are generally ineffective against modern armor like ballistic helmets.
- Scott's testing demonstrates the limitations of medieval weaponry in contemporary combat scenarios, emphasizing the superiority of modern armaments over historical tools.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Are medieval weapons effective in modern times?
Yes, medieval weapons like the spiky scepter and spiky ball on a chain can inflict significant damage on unarmored targets. However, when tested against modern armor like a ballistic helmet, these weapons prove to be less effective. The meat tenderizer with a pointy spike manages to penetrate the helmet, but overall, Scott concludes that medieval weapons are not as effective against modern armor and technology.
What is the sponsor mentioned in the video?
The sponsor mentioned in the video is PDS Debt, which offers debt solutions for individuals facing financial struggles. Scott introduces PDS Debt during the exploration of medieval weapons' effectiveness in modern times.
How does modern armor fare against medieval weapons?
Modern armor, such as a ballistic helmet, proves to be effective against medieval weapons like the spiky scepter and spiky ball on a chain. While these weapons can cause damage, the helmet withstands their impact, highlighting the superiority of modern armor technology over medieval weaponry.
What is the impact of the meat tenderizer with a pointy spike?
The meat tenderizer with a pointy spike manages to penetrate the modern ballistic helmet, showcasing its effectiveness against modern armor. This demonstrates that certain medieval weapons can still be potent against modern protective gear, despite the overall ineffectiveness of medieval weaponry.
What is Scott's final verdict on medieval weapons?
Scott concludes that medieval weapons are generally ineffective against modern armor and technology. While some weapons like the spiky scepter and spiky ball on a chain can cause damage, they are ultimately less effective compared to modern weaponry. This highlights the advancements in technology and armor that have rendered medieval weapons less potent in contemporary combat scenarios.
Related videos
Modern History TV
Can medieval ARROWS defeat ARMOUR, both medieval and modern?!
scholagladiatoria
Are Medieval Maces BAD Weapons in Armored Combat? with @dequitem
Simple History
Medieval Weapons and Armor used in WW1
Sideprojects
The Biggest Misconceptions About Historical Warfare
History Hit
Demonstrating The Power Of The Saxon Blade
Summary
00:00
Medieval Weapons vs Modern Armor: A Test
- Scott from Kentucky Ballistics explores the effectiveness of medieval weapons in modern times.
- He tests various medieval weapons on an unarmored ballistic dummy lab zombie bust.
- The first weapon, the "spiky meatball on a stick," proves lethal but of low quality.
- The "spiky scepter" inflicts significant damage, showcasing the lethality of medieval weapons.
- Modern armor, like a ballistic helmet, withstands the spiky scepter's impact, proving its effectiveness.
- Scott introduces PDS Debt as a sponsor, offering debt solutions for those struggling financially.
- A larger spiky ball on a chain causes damage to the helmet, highlighting the impact of medieval weaponry.
- A meat tenderizer with a pointy spike manages to penetrate the helmet, showcasing its effectiveness.
- Scott concludes that medieval weapons are ineffective against modern armor and technology, favoring modern weaponry.
