The Biggest Misconceptions About Historical Warfare
Sideprojects・2 minutes read
Historical warfare misconceptions arise from media portrayals and poor education, with castle sieges lasting months, line infantry tactics being effective, and pole arms being the primary melee weapons throughout history. Additionally, ancient battle tactics emphasized discipline and cohesion, and medieval plate armor was lighter and more flexible than commonly thought.
Insights
- Castle sieges, contrary to popular belief, could last for months, as seen in the six-month siege of Kenilworth Castle during the second Barons War, debunking the misconception of quick and easy victories in medieval warfare.
- Pole arms, with their superior reach and force, were the prevalent melee weapons historically, especially in group formations, challenging the common notion of swords being the primary choice throughout history.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Were castle sieges quick in history?
No
Was pouring hot oil a common siege tactic?
No
Why were line infantry tactics effective?
Orders, rhythm, defense against cavalry
Were muskets with bayonets practical in combat?
Yes
What was the weight of medieval plate armor?
Around 55 pounds
Related videos
Insider
Ancient Warfare Expert Rates 10 Battle Tactics In Movies And TV | How Real Is It? | Insider
Invicta
How Did Medieval Soldiers Train for War? DOCUMENTARY
Insider
Ancient-Warfare Expert Rates 10 More Battle Tactics In Movies And TV | How Real Is It? | Insider
Insider
Medieval Weapons Master Rates 11 Weapons And Armor In Movies And TV | How Real Is It? | Insider
Invicta
How to Raise a Medieval Army DOCUMENTARY
Summary
00:00
Myths and Realities of Historical Warfare
- Historical warfare misconceptions stem from depictions in TV shows, video games, and subpar education.
- Castle sieges were not quick; successful ones could last months, like the siege of Kenilworth Castle in the second Barons War lasting six months.
- Pouring hot oil on attackers during sieges was a rare tactic due to the cost and logistics involved.
- Line infantry tactics were effective due to the ability to receive orders, maintain a rhythm of firing, and defend against cavalry charges.
- Muskets with bayonets provided versatility for melee combat and holding territory, making them more practical than bows and arrows.
- Morale and confidence were boosted in line infantry formations, ensuring a steady advance and coordinated battle plan.
- Ancient battles were organized, with tactics like the Macedonian phalanx and Roman legions emphasizing discipline and cohesion.
- Medieval plate armor was not as heavy as commonly believed, weighing around 55 pounds, providing flexibility and mobility in combat.
- Swords were not the primary melee weapon throughout history; pole arms with greater reach and force were more commonly used, especially in group formations.
