How Patanjali Fooled India | Coronil vs Supreme Court
Mohak Mangal・2 minutes read
Supreme Court criticizes Uttarakhand government for not acting against Patanjali for misleading ads, leading to severe backlash and accusations of deceiving Indian consumers.
Patanjali's success story intertwined with controversies over misleading ads, unethical practices, and the launch of products like Coronil, highlighting dangers of blind devotion and hero-worship.
Insights
The Supreme Court criticized the Uttarakhand government for not acting against Patanjali's misleading ads, expressing shock at the lack of action despite processed files, revealing a pattern of deception towards Indian consumers.
Patanjali's growth, intertwined with Ramdev's journey from a boy named Ramkishan studying Yoga to the establishment of the company, involved controversial practices, including misleading ads, unethical manufacturing, and legal boundary crossings, showcasing the dangers of blind devotion to charismatic figures and companies, echoing Dr. Ambedkar's caution against hero-worship.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What did the Supreme Court criticize the Uttarakhand government for?
Lack of action against Patanjali for misleading ads
How much revenue did Coronil generate for Patanjali in 4 months?
Rs 250 crores
What led to the formation of Patanjali according to the Summary?
Meeting their guru Acharya Karamveer
What were the key factors attributed to Patanjali's success?
Trust, affordability, and Swadeshi branding
What did the Supreme Court demand from Patanjali regarding false advertisements?