ХОДОРКОВСКИЙ: Что упущено в фильме «Предатели» от ФБК и Марии Певчих

Ходорковский LIVE2 minutes read

A documentary titled "The History of a Big Conspiracy: Who and How Captured Russia" explores the privatization process, oligarchy formation, and business-state fusion in Russia during the nineties, gaining significant viewership. Critics argue the film is one-sided, lacking depth and input from living witnesses, leading to concerns about its portrayal of historical events and potential bias.

Insights

  • The documentary "The History of a Big Conspiracy: Who and How Captured Russia" delves into the privatization process, Yeltsin's rule, oligarchy formation, and the intertwining of business and government in Russia during the nineties, attracting substantial viewership.
  • Critics highlight the film's shortcomings, citing a lack of depth, absence of firsthand testimonies, and a potentially biased narrative that may lean towards propaganda rather than impartial journalism, raising questions about the documentary's credibility and completeness in portraying the complexities of the era.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is the documentary "The History of a Big Conspiracy" about?

    The documentary delves into the privatization process, Yeltsin's rise to power, the oligarchy formation, and the fusion of business and the state in Russia during the nineties.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

"The History of a Big Conspiracy"

  • A film about the nineties was released on the Navalny Live channel, titled "The History of a Big Conspiracy: Who and How Captured Russia," with the author being investigator Maria Pevchikh.
  • The documentary aims to explore the privatization process, Yeltsin's rise to power, the formation of an oligarchy, and the fusion of business and the state in Russia.
  • The video has garnered almost 2.5 million views, making it one of the most popular premieres in the Russian-speaking sphere this spring.
  • Criticism of the film includes accusations of a superficial approach and lack of attention to significant historical shifts during the tumultuous nineties in Russia.
  • Mikhail Khodorkovsky expressed bewilderment and stated that a more detailed conclusion could be drawn after watching the second episode of the series.
  • The film lacks input from living eyewitnesses of the events depicted in the nineties, which could have provided valuable insights and nuances.
  • The documentary is criticized for presenting a one-sided view of historical events, potentially falling into the category of propaganda rather than independent media.
  • The absence of key events like the Chechen War and the White House siege in the film raises concerns about the comprehensive portrayal of the nineties in Russia.
  • Corruption is discussed as a significant issue, with differing opinions on how best to address and combat it, with a focus on the need for objective investigations and accountability.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.