Why BRITISH ARMY Infantry Officers STOPPED carrying SWORDS
scholagladiatoria・16 minutes read
British army infantry officers in World War I abandoned swords and revolvers for defensive weapons like swagger sticks due to visibility in combat and the increased risk of being targeted by enemy marksmen. The decision was not just about combat effectiveness but centered on officers' survival and leadership roles.
Insights
- British army infantry officers in World War I transitioned from swords and revolvers to swagger sticks or canes due to the increased risk of being targeted in combat, emphasizing survival and leadership over traditional weaponry.
- The abandonment of swords by officers was not solely about combat effectiveness but stemmed from the strategic imperative of minimizing visibility and protecting leadership roles in the face of evolving warfare tactics, highlighting the pragmatic adaptation of military practices during World War I.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Why did British army officers abandon swords in World War I?
Visibility and survival concerns led to the decision.
What were the main weapons used by British army officers in World War I?
Officers primarily used revolvers and swagger sticks.
How did the focus on weapon effectiveness impact British army officers in World War I?
The focus was on survival and leadership rather than weapon effectiveness.
What was the significance of the sam brown belt for British army officers in World War I?
The belt held the field service scabbard for officers.
How did the Boer War influence the decision to abandon swords in World War I?
Evidence from the Boer War suggested officers were targeted due to swords.