Tóxicos: Cómo las "sustancias químicas permanentes” están dañando nuestra salud | DW Documental
DW Documental・2 minutes read
PFAS are harmful synthetic chemicals used in various industries but linked to serious health issues and environmental contamination, prompting the EU to consider strict regulations despite industry opposition. As efforts to transition away from PFAS develop, including alternative firefighting foams and textiles, the complexities of managing existing contamination and the high costs associated with cleanup challenge progress.
Insights
- PFAS, or perand polyfluoroalkyl substances, are synthetic chemicals with widespread applications due to their water- and fat-repelling properties, but they pose significant health risks such as fertility issues and certain cancers, leading to increased regulatory scrutiny from the EU despite industry pushback on their essential role in technology and manufacturing.
- The ongoing challenges of PFAS contamination highlight the complexity of remediation efforts, as seen in the destruction of contaminated crops like strawberries resulting in severe financial losses for farmers, and the need for costly purification systems, indicating that addressing this pervasive environmental issue will require substantial investment and a coordinated regulatory approach.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What are PFAS chemicals?
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of synthetic chemicals that have been in use for around 80 years. They are known for their unique properties, such as being non-flammable and repelling water and fat, which makes them valuable in various industries. PFAS are commonly found in products like fast food packaging, firefighting foams, and even medical devices like artificial heart valves. However, their stability and resistance to breakdown in the environment raise significant concerns about their long-term impact on health and ecosystems.
How do PFAS affect human health?
PFAS have been linked to a range of serious health issues, including fertility problems, reduced effectiveness of vaccines, and certain types of cancer. The presence of these chemicals in the environment poses a risk to human health, as they can accumulate in the body over time. Studies have shown that exposure to PFAS can lead to adverse health outcomes, prompting regulatory bodies, particularly in the EU, to consider stricter regulations to limit their use and mitigate their harmful effects on public health.
Why are PFAS difficult to remove from the environment?
PFAS are notoriously difficult to break down due to their strong chemical bonds, which makes them persistent in the environment. They can accumulate in soil and groundwater, particularly near industrial sites and airports where they are commonly used. Traditional methods of environmental cleanup often fall short when it comes to PFAS, as they resist degradation and can leach into water sources. This persistence leads to widespread contamination, complicating efforts to manage and remediate affected areas effectively.
What regulations exist for PFAS in Europe?
In Europe, there have been various regulations aimed at controlling the use of PFAS due to their environmental and health risks. The EU has implemented bans on certain PFAS and established limits on their presence in drinking water. However, there is currently no comprehensive global agreement addressing PFAS contamination, leading to ongoing discussions about the need for a unified approach to manage these chemicals. The regulatory landscape is evolving, with calls for stricter measures to phase out PFAS and protect public health and the environment.
How are farmers affected by PFAS contamination?
Farmers are significantly impacted by PFAS contamination, particularly when it comes to crop production. Testing for PFAS in agricultural products, such as oats and strawberries, is crucial, as contaminated crops cannot be sold, leading to substantial financial losses. For instance, a case involving the destruction of strawberries due to PFAS contamination resulted in losses of up to €80,000. Farmers must also invest in water purification systems to ensure their irrigation sources are safe, adding to their operational costs and complicating their agricultural practices.
Related videos
Summary
00:00
PFAS Contamination Sparks Regulatory and Legal Battles
- PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are synthetic chemicals created around 80 years ago, known for their non-flammable, water- and fat-repelling properties, and high stability, making them widely used in various industries, including fast food packaging and artificial heart valves.
- These substances are harmful, linked to fertility issues, reduced vaccine response, and certain cancers, prompting the EU to consider strict regulations against their use, despite industry opposition citing their essential role in technology and manufacturing.
- PFAS encompass over 10,000 chemicals, characterized by hydrogen atoms being replaced by fluorine, resulting in strong, persistent compounds that accumulate in the environment, particularly in soil and water.
- Agricultural testing for PFAS contamination involves sampling crops like oats before harvest; if contamination is found, the affected crops cannot be sold, leading to significant financial losses for farmers, as seen in a case where 3 hectares of strawberries were destroyed, costing between €70,000 and €80,000.
- PFAS enter the environment through various products, including firefighting foams, textiles, and food packaging, and are difficult to break down, leading to widespread contamination in soil and groundwater, particularly near chemical plants and airports.
- Common PFAS found in contaminated water include PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) and PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid), both of which have been banned or restricted in the EU, yet remain prevalent in groundwater, affecting agricultural irrigation.
- Farmers like Eric Rise, who manage contaminated land, must purify their water using activated carbon filters, which cost between €7,000 and €8,000 each and need to be replaced annually due to saturation from PFAS.
- The EU has implemented regulations over the years, including bans on certain PFAS and limits on their presence in drinking water, but there is no comprehensive global convention addressing the issue, leading to calls for a chemical transition in policy.
- The chemical industry, particularly companies like KEM, argues that excessive regulation could jeopardize technological competitiveness in Europe, while local governments, such as in Dordrecht, are suing for accountability over environmental pollution caused by PFAS.
- The ongoing legal battles and regulatory discussions highlight the complexity of addressing PFAS contamination, with the need for a unified approach to manage and eventually phase out these persistent chemicals from the environment.
18:50
PFAS Controversy Sparks Industry Transformation
- The legal dispute with DuPont, lasting nearly 20 years, revealed that the company was aware of the toxic effects of PFAS since the 1960s but continued to release them into the environment, resulting in approximately $700 million in compensation for affected individuals, with ongoing health monitoring for thousands of residents.
- Firefighting foam previously containing PFAS has been replaced with a new foam that does not form a water film, allowing it to effectively extinguish large fires while being safely disposable, unlike PFAS foam which requires hazardous waste incineration.
- The transition to PFAS-free firefighting techniques necessitates extensive training for firefighters and modifications to thousands of fire extinguishing systems, which involves significant time and financial investment.
- The textile industry has developed water-repellent fabrics that are PFAS-free, with companies like Faude Textile Factory in Algovia leading the way; these new textiles have undergone rigorous testing to ensure they perform comparably to traditional PFAS-coated materials.
- The chemical industry faced pressure from campaigns like Greenpeace's detox initiative, which highlighted the dangers of PFAS, prompting a shift towards developing PFAS-free alternatives, although the process was initially slow due to a lack of demand.
- 3M, a major PFAS manufacturer, plans to eliminate PFAS production by 2025, facing over $10 billion in compensation agreements in 2023 alone due to lawsuits related to PFAS contamination.
- The Dyon factory in Gendorf, a subsidiary of 3M, is the largest fluoropolymer production facility in Europe, producing 40% of the continent's fluoropolymers, which are essential for various technologies, including automotive and electronics.
- Ionisis, a startup in Freiburg, is researching alternatives to PFAS in fuel cells, aiming to develop a market-ready solution by the end of the year, as current fuel cell technology relies heavily on PFAS for proton conduction.
- Natural refrigerants like propane are being explored as alternatives to PFAS in heat pumps, with existing propane heat pumps demonstrating effectiveness comparable to traditional refrigerants, despite industry hesitance due to safety concerns.
- Environmental toxicology tests revealed the presence of PFAS in the blood of individuals, with PFOA being particularly concerning due to its health risks; experts advocate for stricter regulations to mitigate ongoing exposure and environmental contamination.
38:19
PFAS Contamination Cleanup: Challenges and Solutions
- The use of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) is critical in specific applications such as Teflon or fluoropolymer pumps and tubes for dialysis machines, where blood should not pool or stick to heart valves; however, these applications represent only a small fraction of the overall use of PFAS. The European Union is currently evaluating the arguments surrounding PFAS, with a decision expected from the commission, governments, and parliament in two to three years, while the existing environmental contamination from PFAS remains unresolved.
- An estimated 700,000 to 800,000 tons of contaminated soil need to be washed to remove PFAS, utilizing a washing process that involves sifting, rinsing, and shaking the soil with fresh water to dissolve PFAS into the water. The contaminated washing water is then filtered to remove PFAS, which are either burned or deposited in landfills, leaving behind clean sandy soil for reuse as construction material; however, this method is not viable for clayey soils, and the overall effort and costs are substantial, indicating that while there is a possibility to address PFAS contamination, it will be a lengthy and expensive process.
