Thomas Nagel's "What Is It Like To Be a Bat?"
Theory & Philosophy・2 minutes read
Thomas Nagel explores the challenge of reconciling the intangible nature of the mind with the physical body, criticizing reductionists who believe all mental processes can be explained physically. Nagel emphasizes the subjective nature of Consciousness, highlighting the limitations of understanding others solely through physical properties and advocating for an objective phenomenology.
Insights
- Thomas Nagel challenges reductionist views by emphasizing that consciousness is subjective and cannot be fully explained through physical processes alone.
- Nagel underscores the importance of recognizing the limitations of purely physical explanations in understanding consciousness, advocating for an objective phenomenology to delve into subjective experiences.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What is the Mind-Body problem?
The Mind-Body problem refers to the challenge of reconciling the intangible nature of the mind with the physical body.
What is Consciousness according to Nagel?
Nagel emphasizes that Consciousness is subjective and not solely physical.
How does Nagel illustrate the limitations of understanding other species?
Nagel uses the example of a bat's sonar-based perception to illustrate the impossibility of fully comprehending another being's consciousness.
Why does Nagel critique purely physical explanations of Consciousness?
Nagel argues against purely physical explanations of Consciousness, suggesting the need for an objective phenomenology to better grasp subjective experiences.
What is Nagel's stance on the feasibility of fully understanding Consciousness?
Nagel questions the feasibility of ever fully understanding Consciousness, highlighting the inherent subjectivity and complexity of human experiences.
Related videos
Jeffrey Kaplan
What is it Like to be a Bat? - the hard problem of consciousness
YaleCourses
2. Foundations: This Is Your Brain
Big Scientific Questions
One Hour of Mind-Blowing Scientific Theories on Conscious Universe
Talks at Google
The Meta-Problem of Consciousness | Professor David Chalmers | Talks at Google
Talks at Google
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence | John Searle | Talks at Google
Summary
00:00
Understanding Consciousness: Mind vs. Body Debate
- Thomas Nagel's "What is it Like to be a Bat" delves into the Mind-Body problem, highlighting the challenge of reconciling the intangible nature of the mind with the physical body.
- Reductionists believe that all mental processes can be explained physically, but Nagel criticizes this view, emphasizing that Consciousness is subjective and not solely physical.
- Nagel explores the limitations of understanding other species or individuals solely through physical properties, stressing the importance of subjective experience.
- The text uses the example of a bat's sonar-based perception to illustrate the impossibility of fully comprehending another being's consciousness.
- Even if one were to inhabit another human's body, the complexity of their unique mind and experiences would make true understanding impossible.
- Nagel argues against purely physical explanations of Consciousness, suggesting the need for an objective phenomenology to better grasp subjective experiences.
- The pursuit of understanding Consciousness may never reach a definitive conclusion, but the effort to express and explore subjective experiences is deemed noble.
- Nagel's critique extends to psychology, particularly behaviorism, which oversimplifies human behavior by neglecting the mysterious element of Consciousness.
- The text concludes by questioning the feasibility of ever fully understanding Consciousness, highlighting the inherent subjectivity and complexity of human experiences.
