The Invention of Individual Responsibility
Then & Now・2 minutes read
Humans have debated individual responsibility throughout history, with current discussions focused on personal accountability, poverty, and enterprise. Various theories attribute poverty to genetic, cultural, or individual factors, shaping societal perceptions and policies towards welfare and personal responsibility.
Insights
- The historical perspective on individual responsibility has evolved over time, shifting from obligations to care for the poor to emphasizing personal accountability, often disregarding communal responsibilities.
- Various scholars and policymakers, such as Banfield, Lewis, Moynihan, and Cloward, have attributed poverty to cultural factors, family structures, and societal conditions, challenging simplistic views of individual responsibility and advocating for a nuanced understanding of poverty's roots.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What is the concept of individual responsibility?
Individual responsibility emphasizes taking control of one's life.
How has the perception of poverty evolved over time?
The perception of poverty has shifted from moral failure to structural issues.
What are the key criticisms of cultural theories of poverty?
Cultural theories of poverty are criticized for oversimplifying complex issues.
How did political leaders approach poverty in the 20th century?
Political leaders in the 20th century adopted varying approaches to poverty.
What were the key criticisms of Charles Murray's work on poverty?
Charles Murray's work on poverty faced criticism for its focus on genetics.
Related videos
Then & Now
Why Jordan Peterson is Wrong About Responsibility
Free To Choose Network
Milton Friedman Schools Young Idealist (Stanford)
Edward Noda
Intro to Philosophy (SHS)- The Human Person in Society (Part 1)
OSHO International
OSHO: Just Be Responsible to Yourself
The Institute of Art and Ideas
The end of good and evil | Slavoj Žižek, Rowan Williams, Maria Balaska, Richard Wrangham
Summary
00:00
Evolution of Individual Responsibility in Society
- Humans have a natural inclination to investigate and fix problems, questioning the root cause and responsibility.
- Philosophers, theologians, and scientists have debated individual responsibility in the context of free will, sin, and causation.
- Current discussions often focus on individual responsibility in relation to welfare, poverty, and enterprise.
- The concept of 100% responsibility and zero excuses is emphasized, urging individuals to take control of their lives.
- Historical emphasis on individual responsibility has shifted towards personal accountability, often neglecting obligations to others or communities.
- Poverty is often linked to individual responsibility, suggesting that blame for one's condition lies solely with the individual.
- Historical perspectives on responsibility varied, with obligations to care for the poor prevalent in different eras and regions.
- The 19th century saw a shift towards stigmatizing poverty as a moral failure, dividing the poor into the impotent and the able.
- The 20th century introduced eugenics theories linking biology, heredity, and destitution, suggesting poverty was inherent and unchangeable.
- The culture of poverty theory emerged in the mid-20th century, attributing poverty to internal psychological factors or external structural issues beyond individual control.
20:48
Cultural attitudes and policies on poverty.
- Banfield criticized Italian villagers for being inward-looking and resistant to improving infrastructure or aiding neighbors, describing their cultural atmosphere as melancholic.
- Banfield advised Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Reagan, asserting that the American lower classes shared similar cultural attitudes with Italian villagers but were even worse, lacking values like work ethic, sacrifice, and self-improvement.
- Banfield argued that social security programs were futile for the lower class, as they lived in the moment, lacked future planning, and exhibited improvidence and irresponsibility, leading to unskilled work, unstable jobs, and poor family life.
- Oscar Lewis contended that poverty was a cultural way of life passed through generations, with distinct family structures, language, psychology, and worldviews, resulting in maternal deprivation, weak ego structure, and a lack of impulse control.
- Daniel Patrick Moynihan's report on the black family highlighted a cultural problem, attributing black Americans' struggles to a lack of family structure, advocating for interventions to establish stable families for children's well-being.
- Richard Cloward's study on gangs revealed a new youth subculture born from structural conditions, challenging the American dream's feasibility for many, leading to disillusionment and rebellion.
- Lyndon B. Johnson declared an unconditional war on poverty in 1964, focusing on community initiatives like Operation Head Start to create jobs and support, aiming to alleviate poverty and prevent it.
- Johnson's war on poverty coincided with a decline in poverty rates, but critics emerged, blaming genetics for poverty, suggesting innate deficiencies in character or intelligence as the root cause.
- The 1970s saw a conservative backlash against big government and social programs, with Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher emphasizing individual responsibility over government intervention, attributing poverty to welfare, laziness, and moral decay.
- George Gilder's "Wealth and Poverty" and Charles Murray's "Losing Ground" reimagined capitalism as altruistic and emphasized individual responsibility for others, with Gilder focusing on the gift impulse and Murray highlighting the failure of government interventions in addressing poverty.
40:22
"Poverty, Welfare, and Genetics: 1965-1990"
- Economy worsened after 1973, leading to a decline in poverty rates between 1965 and 1980.
- Charles Murray distorted social program achievements, ignoring reduced poverty among the elderly, improved medical care access, and legal aid.
- Clinton's welfare reform emphasized individual responsibility, shifting away from entitlements.
- "The Bell Curve" by Murray and Hernstein focused on genetic factors in poverty, criticized for statistical errors and outdated views.
- Criticisms of Murray's work highlight the importance of social environment over genetics in poverty risk.
- Shift in societal focus towards personal responsibility, welfare limitations, and cultural criticisms emerged in the 90s, impacting policy and public discourse.
