Swords are... Kind of Silly, Actually!
Skallagrim・10 minutes read
Swords were prestigious but impractical weapons due to their complex manufacturing process and lower durability compared to simpler weapons like pole arms, despite their cultural value. The speaker humorously critiques the appeal and impracticality of swords, highlighting their disadvantages compared to more practical and durable weapons like axes and pole arms.
Insights
- Swords, despite their prestige and cultural significance, were often criticized for being less practical and durable compared to simpler weapons like pole arms.
- The speaker humorously critiques the intricate and challenging process of making swords, highlighting the impracticality of these weapons despite their association with the upper classes.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What were ancient weapons made from?
Metal and rocks
Why were swords associated with the upper classes?
Cost and skill required
What advantages did pole arms have over swords?
Reach and durability
What challenges did sword makers face?
Complexity and errors
What were the disadvantages of swords in combat?
Clunkiness and durability
Related videos
scholagladiatoria
CHOPPY SHORT SWORDS: The most POPULAR across World & History?
scholagladiatoria
Zweihander vs Polearm: How two-handed swords are different to pole weapons
History Hit
Demonstrating The Power Of The Saxon Blade
Tod's Workshop
Medieval swords were (usually) awful - A response to Matt Easton
Modern History TV
How BIG did SWORDS get?
Summary
00:00
Evolution and Critique of Ancient Swords
- In ancient times, weapons evolved from rocks to refined metal, leading to the creation of swords.
- Swords, despite being costly and requiring specialized skills to make, gained prestige and were associated with the upper classes.
- The process of making swords involved intricate steps and materials, making them valuable but less practical than simpler weapons like axes or sticks.
- Long knives and swords offered versatility and self-defense capabilities, although they were challenging to make and prone to errors.
- Pole arms, like halberds, were more practical and effective in combat due to their reach and durability compared to swords.
- Despite the cultural value attached to swords, their disadvantages, such as being clunky and less durable than pole arms, were highlighted.
- The speaker, while acknowledging the appeal of swords, humorously critiques their practicality and the elaborate processes involved in their creation.
