‘She knew who she married’: Grisham weighs in on Cohen’s testimony about Melania Trump
CNN・3 minutes read
The prosecution in the Cohen case accused him of creating false evidence and campaign finance violations, implicating Allen Weisselberg. Michael Cohen's testimony and reactions on the stand, along with Hope Hicks highlighting his loyalty to Trump, could sway the jury's perception and impact the case's outcome.
Insights
- The prosecution in the Cohen case presented evidence of false evidence creation and campaign finance violations, implicating Allen Weisselberg.
- Michael Cohen's testimony and reactions on the stand, closely watched for their impact on the case's outcome, were highlighted for his loyalty to Trump by Hope Hicks, potentially shaping the jury's perception of him.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Who is Michael Cohen?
Michael Cohen is a key figure in the case, providing crucial testimony.
Related videos
ABC News
Jury hears secret recording of Trump discussing catch-and-kill payment
MSNBC
'Evolution of lies': Lawrence O'Donnell on Michael Cohen's testimony
NBC News
Trump on trial: Michael Cohen takes the stand in hush money trial
NBC News
Meet the Press NOW — May 13
MSNBC
Nicolle Wallace on Trump: He lied about his wealth, he lied about his sex life
Summary
00:00
Cohen case: False evidence, finance violations, loyalty.
- The prosecution in the Cohen case alleged creation of false evidence, directing campaign finance violations, and provided evidence implicating Allen Weisselberg.
- On October 8th, there was a two-minute call between Donald Trump and someone who opened an account and transferred money early in the morning.
- Michael Cohen's testimony was crucial, with his reactions on the stand being closely monitored, potentially impacting the case's outcome.
- Hope Hicks highlighted Cohen's loyalty to Trump, emphasizing his role as a client's advocate, which could influence the jury's perception of him.
