Piers Morgan debates UK leader of Islamic Extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir
Sky News Australia・20 minutes read
Dr. Wahed Azif Sha, an NHS GP and Islamic extremist leader, supports Jihad for military intervention in Gaza to protect the population. Another speaker, Lukar MIM, advocates for Islamic law, emphasizes family values, and opposes Western liberal ideologies, including LGBT rights and feminism.
Insights
- Dr. Wahed Azif Sha, a GP with the NHS for 25 years, leads an Islamic extremist group and calls for Jihad at anti-Israel demonstrations, justifying it as a call for official armies to intervene in Gaza to protect the population and ensure human rights, contrasting with the interviewer's perspective on Hamas' actions.
- Lukar MIM advocates for Islamic law as a standard, opposes liberal, LGBT, and feminist ideologies, emphasizes family values, wealth circulation, and accountable government, treating all patients with respect despite viewing homosexuality as a sin, promoting the benefits of an Islamic system for Muslims, Jews, and Christians coexisting.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What are Dr. Sha's views on military intervention in Gaza?
Dr. Sha defends the chanting of Jihad as a call for official armies to intervene in Gaza, comparing it to situations like Ukraine where military intervention was supported. He justifies the resistance in Gaza as a response to occupation, not terrorism, advocating for Muslim armies to protect the population and ensure human rights.
How does Dr. Sha justify the actions of Hamas in Gaza?
Dr. Sha refuses to condemn the actions of Hamas, attributing responsibility to Israel and other powers. He views the conflict in Gaza as a response to occupation, not terrorism, aligning with his perspective on the need for military intervention by Muslim countries to protect the population.
What does Dr. Sha believe about the role of Islamic law in society?
Dr. Sha advocates for the implementation of Islamic law as the standard in the country, emphasizing the benefits of the Islamic system for Muslims, Jews, and Christians living together. He believes in upholding family values, circulating wealth within the economic system, and views homosexuality as a sin.
How does Dr. Sha's perspective on the conflict in Gaza differ from the interviewer's?
Dr. Sha's views on the conflict in Gaza clash with the interviewer's perspective on Hamas' actions. While Dr. Sha justifies the resistance in Gaza as a response to occupation and calls for military intervention by Muslim countries, the interviewer may have a different stance on the situation.
What are the ethical implications discussed regarding the conflict in Gaza?
The discussion delves into the ethical implications of the conflict in Gaza, particularly focusing on the role of military intervention. Dr. Sha advocates for Muslim armies to intervene to protect the population and ensure human rights, highlighting the complexities and differing perspectives on the situation.
Related videos
FRANCE 24 English
Accused of anti-Semitism, comedian Bassem Youssef slams 'empty accusation' • FRANCE 24 English
CBN News
Son of Hamas Co-Founder Denounces Group at UN, Exposes 'Savage' Indoctrination of Palestinian Kids
Hasna Mana Hai
Sher Afzal Marwat in Hasna Mana Hai - Tabish Hashmi - Digitally Presented by Surf Excel
kasisolusi
HATI-HATI! INI PENYEBAB ORANG BISA MENJADI GAY/LESBI MENURUT DOKTER KEJIWAAN - dr. Isa Multazam Noor
The New Culture Forum
Integration has FAILED! If You Want Shariah Law, Leave Britain!