'Pathetic!': Pulitzer-winning historian calls Trump 'constitutionally illiterate'
MSNBC・4 minutes read
Lawrence Lessig is involved in an amicus brief at Stanford University to educate on the Framers' views on executive power. Lessig criticizes Trump's claims of presidential immunity, emphasizing the Constitution's framework for executive power.
Insights
- Lawrence Lessig is actively engaged in providing historical context on executive power through an amicus brief at Stanford University, aiming to educate the Supreme Court and the public on the Framers' nuanced perspectives.
- Lessig critiques Trump's assertions of immunity from legal constraints, emphasizing the Founding Generation's deliberate balance between empowering and limiting executive power as enshrined in the Constitution.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Who is Lawrence Lessig?
Lawrence Lessig is a Pulitzer Prize-winning author.
Related videos
Ford School of Public Policy
Lawrence Lessig: How money corrupts Congress
CNN
Ex-Trump official predicts Melania's behavior amid Trump criminal trial
Yuval Noah Harari
Fei-Fei Li & Yuval Noah Harari in Conversation - The Coming AI Upheaval
CrashCourse
Presidential Power: Crash Course Government and Politics #11
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
Sen. Whitehouse and Lawrence Slam the Corporate Capture and Control of the Supreme Court
Summary
00:00
"Lessig challenges Trump on executive power"
- Lawrence Lessig, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author, is involved in an amicus brief at Stanford University regarding the Constitution's history and executive power.
- The brief aims to provide a more accurate historical context to educate both the Supreme Court and the American public on the complexities of the Framers' views on executive power.
- The concern to limit executive power was a major theme in British and American political thinking in the 17th and 18th centuries, leading to the Founding Generation's focus on balancing empowerment and limitation of executive power.
- Lessig criticizes Trump's claims of presidential immunity from legal constraints, highlighting the outrageousness of such assertions and emphasizing the Constitution's framework for executive power.
