Patanjali Vs Supreme Court | How Baba Ramdev Grew Powerful Enough to Mock The Law | Akash Banerjee

The Deshbhakt・2 minutes read

Ramdev Baba and Patanjali's managing director apologize to the Supreme Court, which criticizes them for deceptive advertising practices and lack of accountability. Despite warnings and fines, Patanjali continues misleading ads, prompting questions about public health and safety and highlighting the need for stricter regulation in the healthcare sector.

Insights

  • Patanjali, led by Ramdev, has a history of running false advertisements, abusing science, and prioritizing profit over truth, despite warnings and fines from the Supreme Court, highlighting the need for accountability and consumer protection in the realm of alternative medicine.
  • The Supreme Court's scrutiny of Patanjali's misleading ads is seen as a significant step towards boosting healthcare regulation and consumer policy in India, reflecting the court's commitment to addressing public health concerns and holding companies accountable for deceptive practices.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • Why is the Supreme Court questioning Patanjali?

    Lack of investigation into false advertising complaints.

  • What controversies surround Baba Ramdev?

    Controversial statements on AIDS, homosexuality, and Coronil promotion.

  • How did Patanjali acquire Ruchi Soya Company?

    Acquisition for 4300 crore rupees in 2019.

  • What is the impact of Patanjali's misleading ads?

    Negative brand image and decreased turnover.

  • Why did SBI lie to the Supreme Court?

    Regarding electoral bonds in Chandigarh elections.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Supreme Court questions Patanjali's false advertising

  • Ramdev Baba and Patanjali's managing director, Acharya Balkrishna, are apologizing to the Supreme Court judges, but the court views this as mere lip service and deception.
  • The Supreme Court questions the government and Ayush department for not investigating Baba Ramdev despite complaints about false advertising by Patanjali.
  • In November, the Supreme Court instructed Patanjali to cease false and misleading ads, but Baba Ramdev continued with supreme confidence.
  • Anil Masih apologized for his role in the Chandigarh elections, while SBI lied to the Supreme Court regarding electoral bonds.
  • Patanjali has been running false advertisements, abusing allopathy and science, misleading consumers, and prioritizing profit over truth.
  • The Supreme Court's observations are seen as a boost for healthcare regulation and consumer policy in the country.
  • Patanjali's misleading advertisements have a long history, with the case in the Supreme Court starting in 2022 and escalating due to continued false advertising.
  • Despite warnings and fines from the Supreme Court, Patanjali persisted with misleading ads, leading to further court action and questioning of public health and safety.
  • Baba Ramdev's controversial statements on AIDS, homosexuality, and the promotion of Coronil during the COVID crisis have raised significant concerns and backlash.
  • Ramdev's rise from a yoga guru to a business magnate, his nationalist branding, political connections, and the growth of Patanjali into a multi-billion-dollar empire are detailed, showcasing his influence and controversies.

19:05

Patanjali's Controversies and Brand Image Decline

  • Patanjali, led by Ramdev, acquired Ruchi Soya Company for 4300 crore rupees in 2019, aiming to become a major FMCG company in India and made significant investments in land deals, exploiting legal loopholes in Haryana's Aravali forest area.
  • Ramdev and Patanjali faced criticism for their unverified product, Coronil, which was not peer-reviewed or tested extensively, raising concerns about their commitment to public health despite their own reliance on allopathic medicine in personal health emergencies.
  • The negative impact on Patanjali's brand image due to decreasing turnover, coupled with the need for regulation and proper testing of Ayurvedic supplements, highlights the importance of holding companies like Patanjali accountable for their claims and ensuring consumer protection in the realm of alternative medicine.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.