LoginGet started

Palestine Talks | Chris Hedges on the moral corruption of Israel and the “savagery” of violence

TRT World・27 minutes read

The text discusses the moral evil of Israel's actions in Gaza, comparing them to other settler colonial states and emphasizing the failure of peaceful solutions. It highlights the dehumanization of Palestinians, the lack of intervention by Western governments, and the importance of global reactions to prevent humanitarian crises and maintain international law.

Insights

  • Israel's shift towards Messianic Zionism has led to a more overt acceptance of genocidal intentions towards Palestinians, highlighting a dangerous escalation in the conflict's rhetoric and potential outcomes.
  • The failure of peaceful solutions like the Oslo Accords has solidified Palestinians' realization that a two-state solution is unfeasible due to Israel's expansion of settlements, emphasizing the urgent need for alternative approaches to address the ongoing crisis in Gaza and Palestine.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is the philosophical discussion surrounding the situation in Gaza and Palestine?

    The Summary delves into the moral evil of Israel's actions in Gaza, comparing them to historical settler colonial states like British rule in India and Kenya. It highlights the failure of peaceful solutions like the Oslo Accords and the shift from Liberal Zionism to religious Messianic Zionism in Israel. The dehumanization of the colonized population is emphasized as essential for maintaining a settler colonial project, leading to violence and corruption within the occupying society.

  • How does the Western media address the situation in Gaza?

    The Summary points out the Western media's reluctance to cover the situation in Gaza, attributing it to a lack of historical knowledge and the influence of the powerful Israel Lobby. It discusses how the media's biased coverage, particularly by The New York Times, neutralizes reports by countering on-the-ground information with Israeli defense statements. This failure to provide accurate coverage contributes to perpetuating violence in Gaza.

  • What are the implications of settler colonial projects like Israel's?

    The Summary highlights the catastrophic humanitarian crises and violence against the indigenous population that result from settler colonial projects like Israel's. It discusses the contradictions of Liberal Zionism, the acceptance of genocidal intentions towards Palestinians, and the threat to international law posed by governments' failure to intervene in the situation in Gaza and Palestine.

  • How do oppressed populations respond to annihilation?

    The Summary suggests that when faced with annihilation and oppressive conditions imposed by occupying forces like Israel, oppressed populations like the Palestinians are left with no choice but violence. It draws parallels to conflicts like Sarajevo, where violence becomes the only option for survival in the face of existential threats.

  • What role does the boycott, divestment, and sanction movement play in addressing the situation in Gaza?

    The Summary discusses the importance of the boycott, divestment, and sanction movement in isolating and sanctioning Israel, similar to the approach used against apartheid in South Africa. It emphasizes how these actions are crucial in exposing Israel's continuous violation of international law and its apartheid nature, diminishing its global standing.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

"Israel's Colonial Violence in Gaza"

  • The situation in Gaza and Palestine is discussed in a philosophical context, focusing on the moral evil committed by Israel and the broader implications for humanity.
  • Israel's actions in Gaza are compared to those of other settler colonial states like the British in India and Kenya, highlighting the common narrative of occupation and violence.
  • Attempts to control the indigenous population in Palestine through collaboration and subterfuge have not been as successful as in other colonial contexts.
  • The failure of peaceful solutions like Oslo led to a realization among Palestinians that a two-state solution was not feasible due to Israel's expansion of settlements.
  • The Western media's reluctance to address the situation in Gaza is attributed to a lack of historical knowledge and the influence of the powerful Israel Lobby.
  • The dehumanization of the colonized population is essential for maintaining a settler colonial project, leading to corruption and violence within the occupying society.
  • The shift from Liberal Zionism to religious Messianic Zionism in Israel has resulted in a more open acceptance of genocidal intentions towards Palestinians.
  • The consequences of settler colonial projects, like the one in Israel, often lead to catastrophic humanitarian crises and violence against the indigenous population.
  • Liberal Zionism is considered contradictory due to the inherent violence and ethnic cleansing required to maintain a settler colonial state.
  • The failure of governments, especially in the West, to intervene in the situation in Gaza and Palestine poses a threat to international law and the global order, leading to reactions from the global South and potential consequences for shared humanity.

18:31

Global South Supports Palestinians Against Israeli Apartheid

  • South Africa brought the case to the international court of justice due to historical similarities with Palestinian conditions under apartheid.
  • Global South countries empathize with Palestinians' suffering, contrasting with the US and Israel's lack of meaningful action against genocide.
  • Violence becomes the only option when oppressed populations face annihilation, as seen in conflicts like Sarajevo.
  • Palestinians are left with no choice but violence due to oppressive conditions imposed by Israel.
  • The New York Times' biased coverage of Gaza neutralizes reports by countering on-the-ground information with Israeli defense statements.
  • Israel uses fabricated narratives to dehumanize Palestinians and justify attacks on civilian targets.
  • Foreign press complicity and New York Times' failure to provide accurate coverage contribute to perpetuating violence in Gaza.
  • The New York Times' liberal stance does not extend to economic justice issues, maintaining a pro-establishment and pro-militarism narrative.
  • Israel's continuous violation of international law and its apartheid nature have been exposed, diminishing its global standing.
  • The boycott, divestment, and sanction movement is crucial in isolating and sanctioning Israel, akin to the approach used against apartheid in South Africa.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.