LEADERSHIP LAB: The Craft of Writing Effectively

UChicago Social Sciences・2 minutes read

The University of Chicago's writing program focuses on assisting faculty with writing effectively and generating valuable content, challenging traditional writing education approaches. Students are encouraged to prioritize creating impactful content that is valuable to readers and to consider their perspectives and needs in academic writing.

Insights

The University of Chicago's writing program focuses on improving faculty writing skills rather than traditional student-centered writing education, challenging the standard approach to writing instruction.
The program emphasizes the value of writing being beneficial to readers, urging students to consider readers' perspectives and needs, highlighting the importance of clarity, organization, and persuasion in creating impactful content.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

How does the University of Chicago's writing program differ from other schools?
The University of Chicago's writing program takes a unique top-down approach, focusing on improving faculty writing skills rather than traditional student composition.
What is the main emphasis of the University of Chicago's writing program?
The program emphasizes teaching faculty to write effectively, generating valuable content for readers and challenging standard notions of writing education.
Why is it important for writers at the University of Chicago to consider readers' perspectives?
Writers at the University of Chicago are urged to consider readers' perspectives to create valuable and impactful content, prioritizing clarity and relevance over personal expression.
How does the University of Chicago address challenges in effective communication through writing?
The program addresses challenges of experts hindering reader comprehension by emphasizing the importance of writing being valuable to readers, focusing on clarity and organization.
What is the significance of avoiding the urge to explain when faced with criticism in writing?
In writing, it is important to focus on changing readers' ideas rather than conveying personal thoughts, emphasizing the value of work and incorporating specific words that create value for readers.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

University of Chicago's Faculty-Focused Writing Program

University of Chicago's writing program takes a top-down approach to writing, unlike other schools that focus on freshmen composition.
The program was created to assist faculty rather than students, aiming to improve faculty writing skills.
Writing is not considered a basic skill at the University of Chicago, challenging the standard notion of writing education.
The program emphasizes teaching faculty to write effectively, focusing on generating valuable content for readers.
Expert writers at the university are those with expert knowledge in a specific subject, requiring writing to aid in their complex thinking processes.
Writing at the university involves generating text while thinking, which poses challenges in effectively communicating ideas to readers.
The program addresses the challenge of experts using language patterns that may hinder reader comprehension.
Readers may struggle to understand texts that do not align with their reading patterns, leading to misunderstandings and frustration.
The program emphasizes the importance of writing being valuable to readers, as clarity, organization, and persuasion are secondary to value.
Students are urged to consider readers' perspectives and needs in their writing, focusing on creating content that is valuable and impactful.

17:43

"Low probability of coexistence in biology"

Theoretical probability of clonal and sexual coexistence is low due to the cost of sex in biology.
Coexistence observed in invertebrate taxa within the Frozen Niche variation model.
Predictions of wider Niche breadth for sexuals and Clones in the FNB model.
Performances in monocultures and mixtures do not align with the FNB model's predictions.
Potential cause for discrepancies could be switching of behaviors or resource use patterns between mixed and pure cultures.
Post-study will examine the predictions of the FNB model.
The importance of avoiding the urge to explain when faced with criticism.
Writing should focus on changing readers' ideas rather than conveying the writer's thoughts.
Emphasizing the value of work over the pursuit of new or original ideas.
Encouragement to identify and incorporate specific words that create value for readers in academic writing.

35:16

Understanding Readers: Key to Effective Writing

Knowing your subject matter is not enough; understanding your readers is crucial.
Words like "community," "widely accepted," and "reported" signal a community of readers.
Transition words like "nonetheless," "however," and "although" help in creating value in writing.
Flow words like "because" and "if" are not bad but are not directly related to value creation.
Addressing the dominant figures in your field with respect and appreciation is essential.
Introductions should provide a quick version of why readers might be wrong to engage them.
Writing essays should focus on helping readers understand better, not preserving ideas indefinitely.
The function of writing is to change readers' thoughts, not just communicate personal ideas.
Language has multiple functions, and academic writing aims to change the ideas of an existing community.
The relationship between knowledge suppliers and users is akin to commodity producers and consumers, based on value.

53:59

Creating Tension: Writing Problems and Solutions

Flow words like "however," "but," "although," "inconsistent," and "anomaly" create tension in writing.
The traditional model of writing, starting with background or definitions and leading to a thesis, is problematic.
Instead of starting with generalizations, begin with a specific problem relevant to readers.
Problems in writing should be located in something readers care about, not in the readers themselves.
Problems in writing should be followed by a solution that addresses the readers' concerns.
Problems in writing should highlight instability and inconsistency to engage readers effectively.
Readers seek language that shows inconsistency and tension, not continuity and stability.
Use coded language of costs and benefits to show readers how instability affects them.
Professional literature reviews should enrich problems by introducing tension and complexity.
Avoid the trap of filling gaps in knowledge, as knowledge is infinite and gaps are endless.

01:13:15

Navigating diverse reader communities in interdisciplinary writing.

Interdisciplinary writing is challenging due to different communities of readers interpreting content differently.
Bill's writing exemplifies effective functional writing by addressing two distinct reader communities.
Page 13 summarizes a model, while page 16 showcases exceptional problem construction by economists.
Page 17 introduces a unique chart as a problem construction technique, deviating from traditional uses.
John Totino's article on Mexican Independence challenges established historical views, presenting a new interpretation based on detailed data analysis.

Try it yourself — It’s free.