Best Ceramic Coating? $8 vs $120? Let’s Find Out!

Project Farm2 minutes read

Unprotected car paint finishes deteriorate faster than protected ones, with a comparison test on $8 versus $150 ceramic coatings revealing differences in performance and protection levels from environmental contaminants. Nano Bond emerges as the top performer for water beading and protection, while Shine Armor and Hybrid Solutions show weaknesses in durability against damage from bug and tar remover tests.

Insights

  • Unprotected car paint deteriorates faster than protected surfaces, highlighting the importance of ceramic coatings for long-term protection against environmental contaminants and damage.
  • Nano Bond emerges as a top performer in water beading and protection tests, showcasing its effectiveness in maintaining paint integrity and durability compared to other tested ceramic coatings.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • How do unprotected car paint finishes compare to protected ones?

    Unprotected car paint finishes deteriorate faster than protected ones due to exposure to environmental contaminants, UV rays, and other damaging elements. Protected finishes, such as those treated with ceramic coatings, offer a layer of defense against these factors, helping to maintain the paint's appearance and integrity over time.

  • What is the process for testing ceramic coatings on car paint?

    The testing process for ceramic coatings on car paint involves several steps. It begins with washing the vehicle using a strip wash to remove any existing contaminants. A clay bar is then used to further clean the paint surface, followed by the application of an iron remover to eliminate brake dust. The ceramic coatings are then tested for slickness and performance, with each coating undergoing a detailed application process to assess its protective qualities.

  • How do different ceramic coatings compare in terms of performance?

    Different ceramic coatings are compared based on factors such as slickness and protection. In the testing process, it was found that some coatings, like Nano Bond, excelled in water beading, while others, like F11, offered protection but allowed water to form a sheet. Each coating's performance was evaluated, with some, like Hybrid Solutions, holding up well, and others, like Cerakote and Chemical Guys, performing decently in terms of protection and slickness.

  • What impact did the Bug and Tar Remover have on the ceramic coatings?

    The Bug and Tar Remover test revealed that some ceramic coatings were more resistant to damage than others. While coatings like Shine Armor and Hybrid Solutions suffered damage from the remover, Nano Bond remained strong and maintained its protective qualities. This test highlighted the varying levels of durability and resilience among different ceramic coatings when exposed to harsh chemicals.

  • Which ceramic coatings performed best in the Degreaser test?

    In the Degreaser test, Nano Bond and Adams emerged as the top performers among the ceramic coatings. While Nano Bond showed slight damage but retained its protective qualities, Adams excelled in minimizing water sheet formation. This test demonstrated the effectiveness of these coatings in withstanding harsh chemicals and maintaining their protective properties.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Comparing Ceramic Coatings for Car Paint

  • Unprotected car paint finishes deteriorate faster than protected ones
  • Testing $8 ceramic coating against a $150 one for paint protection
  • Initial test involves checking protection on car paint and plastic
  • Process starts with washing the vehicle using strip wash
  • Clay bar used to remove environmental contaminants from paint
  • Iron remover applied to eliminate any remaining brake dust
  • Shine Armor brand offers waterless wash coat at $8
  • Testing slickness of paint before applying ceramic coatings
  • Application process detailed for each ceramic coating tested
  • Comparison of different ceramic coatings based on slickness and performance

11:53

Top-performing coatings in durability tests

  • Iron remover impacted Shine Armor's protection, Hybrid Solutions holding up well, but Cerakote and Chemical Guys also performing decently.
  • Nano Bond excels with water beading, F11 offers some protection but water forms a sheet, Advanced Graphene trails behind.
  • Bug and Tar Remover tests the coatings, causing damage to Shine Armor and Hybrid Solutions, but Nano Bond remains strong.
  • Polycarbonate test pieces endure warm water spray for hours, Nano Bond performs best, Hybrid Solutions used up, and Advanced Graphene struggles.
  • Degreaser test reveals Nano Bond and Adams as top performers, Nano Bond slightly damaged but still protective, Adams excels with minimal water sheet formation.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.