12 Russians Charged With Hacking Democrats in 2016 US Election

CBS New York14 minutes read

A grand jury indicted 12 Russian military officers for interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, detailing their hacking tactics and misinformation efforts through fake online personas. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein emphasized that there was no evidence of coordination with Americans or impact on vote counts, highlighting the need for unity against foreign electoral interference.

Insights

  • The indictment of 12 Russian military officers, announced by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, highlights a detailed operation involving hacking and misinformation aimed at disrupting the 2016 U.S. presidential election, including unauthorized access to sensitive campaign information and the creation of fake online personas to spread stolen documents.
  • Despite the serious allegations and extensive cyber operations linked to the Russian intelligence units, Rosenstein confirmed that there was no evidence of coordination with any Americans and reassured that the hacking did not affect the actual vote counts, underscoring the need for vigilance against foreign interference in U.S. elections.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is a grand jury indictment?

    A grand jury indictment is a formal accusation that a person has committed a crime, issued by a grand jury after reviewing evidence presented by a prosecutor. The grand jury, which is a group of citizens, determines whether there is enough evidence to charge someone with a crime, leading to a trial. This process is often used in serious criminal cases, allowing the legal system to assess the validity of the charges before proceeding. The indictment serves as a crucial step in the judicial process, ensuring that individuals are not unjustly charged without sufficient evidence.

  • How does hacking affect elections?

    Hacking can significantly impact elections by compromising the integrity of the electoral process, stealing sensitive information, and spreading misinformation. When hackers infiltrate campaign networks or election administration systems, they can access confidential data, manipulate public perception, and disrupt the normal functioning of democratic processes. For instance, stolen emails and documents can be leaked to sway public opinion or create distrust in candidates. Additionally, hacking can lead to unauthorized access to voter information, potentially undermining voter confidence and participation. Overall, such cyber operations pose a serious threat to the fairness and security of elections.

  • What is spear phishing?

    Spear phishing is a targeted attempt to steal sensitive information from individuals by masquerading as a trustworthy entity in electronic communications. Unlike general phishing attacks that are sent to many people, spear phishing is personalized and directed at specific individuals or organizations. Attackers often gather information about their targets to craft convincing emails that appear legitimate, tricking recipients into revealing passwords, financial information, or other confidential data. This method is particularly dangerous because it exploits the trust and familiarity of the target, making it more likely for them to fall victim to the scam.

  • What are the consequences of election interference?

    The consequences of election interference can be profound and far-reaching, affecting not only the immediate electoral outcomes but also public trust in democratic institutions. When foreign entities manipulate or disrupt elections, it can lead to questions about the legitimacy of the results, erode voter confidence, and create divisions within society. Additionally, such interference can prompt governmental responses, including sanctions or policy changes, and may lead to increased security measures in future elections. Ultimately, the long-term impact can include a weakened democratic process and a heightened sense of vulnerability among citizens regarding their electoral rights.

  • Why is cybersecurity important for elections?

    Cybersecurity is crucial for elections because it protects the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of electoral processes and data. As elections increasingly rely on digital systems for voter registration, ballot casting, and result tabulation, the risk of cyberattacks grows. Effective cybersecurity measures help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information, safeguard against data breaches, and ensure that election outcomes are accurate and trustworthy. By implementing robust cybersecurity protocols, election officials can mitigate the risks posed by hackers and foreign interference, ultimately preserving public confidence in the democratic process and the legitimacy of election results.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Russian Officers Indicted for Election Interference

  • A grand jury in Washington, D.C. indicted 12 Russian military officers for conspiring to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as announced by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
  • Eleven of the defendants are charged with hacking into computers, stealing documents, and releasing them to disrupt the election process, while one defendant is specifically charged with infiltrating election administration organizations.
  • The indicted individuals are associated with two units of the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), which conducted cyber operations aimed at influencing the election.
  • The defendants employed spear phishing techniques, sending deceptive emails to trick users into revealing passwords and security information, and installed malicious software to monitor users and capture sensitive data.
  • They accessed email accounts of campaign volunteers and employees, including the campaign chairman, starting in March 2016, and hacked into networks of a congressional campaign committee and a national political committee.
  • The conspirators created fake online personas, such as "D.C. Leaks" and "Guccifer 2.0," to disseminate thousands of stolen emails and documents beginning in June 2016, falsely claiming they were American hackers.
  • Stolen documents were also transferred to an unnamed organization to facilitate their public release, with discussions on timing to maximize electoral impact.
  • A second conspiracy involved hacking a state elections board's website, stealing information on 5,000 voters, and targeting election officials with spear phishing emails containing malicious software.
  • The indictment includes 11 criminal allegations, including unauthorized computer access, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering through cryptocurrency transactions to conceal connections to Russia.
  • The investigation is ongoing, with no allegations that any American citizen committed a crime or that the conspiracy altered vote counts or election results, emphasizing the need for unity against foreign interference in U.S. elections.

12:30

Russian Officers Indicted for Election Hacking

  • The Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein, announced the indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officers charged with hacking the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, which includes 11 criminal counts. This indictment follows a previous one from February that charged 13 Russians with election meddling.
  • The investigation, led by the Special Counsel, has resulted in indictments against 20 individuals and three businesses, despite criticisms labeling it a "witch hunt." The Justice Department has publicly named the Russian intelligence officers involved and detailed their actions, which included two units: one for stealing information and another for disseminating it to influence the election.
  • The Deputy Attorney General confirmed that there was no known coordination between the Russian operatives and any Americans, asserting that the hacking did not impact the overall voting count. He emphasized the importance of briefing President Trump on these findings, especially as he prepares for a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
  • The timing of the indictment, just three days before President Trump's meeting with Putin, raised questions about whether it was intended to send a message. The Deputy Attorney General stated that indictments are made only when there is sufficient evidence, and he took the time to brief the President on the allegations before they were made public.
  • Concurrently, President Trump was in England, where he faced significant protests against his visit, with tens of thousands of demonstrators gathering in Trafalgar Square. The protests were fueled by opposition to his policies and his presence in the UK, particularly regarding immigration and trade, reflecting a strong sentiment against his administration among the British public.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.