Why Don't We Shoot Nuclear Waste Into Space?
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell・2 minutes read
High-level nuclear waste poses challenges in disposal, with space launch deemed impractical and costly due to limited capacity and various risks associated with sending waste into space.
Insights
- High-level nuclear waste, the most dangerous type, is produced in significant quantities by active nuclear reactors, accumulating to 400,000 tons since 1954, posing a substantial disposal challenge.
- Despite the potential risks and impracticality, launching nuclear waste into space is considered unfeasible due to exorbitant costs, limited space launch capacity, and complex challenges associated with space transportation, making it an unfavorable disposal option.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What are the different levels of nuclear waste?
Nuclear waste is categorized into low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level waste, with high-level waste being the most dangerous and difficult to handle due to its high levels of radioactivity.
How much high-level nuclear waste is produced annually?
Approximately 11,000 tons of high-level nuclear waste are produced annually by around 440 active nuclear reactors, accumulating to 400,000 tons since 1954.
Is launching high-level nuclear waste into space feasible?
Launching high-level nuclear waste into space is not feasible due to cost and logistical constraints, with each reactor's waste disposal via space launch estimated to cost $100 million annually.
What are the challenges of sending nuclear waste into space?
Sending nuclear waste into space poses significant challenges, including the high cost of launching, space junk management, and the risk of radioactive particles re-entering Earth's atmosphere.
Why is shooting nuclear waste into space considered a bad idea?
Shooting nuclear waste into space is considered one of the worst ideas for disposal due to its impracticality, high cost, and potential risks associated with managing space junk and radioactive particles re-entering Earth's atmosphere.
Related videos
Sabine Hossenfelder
Nuclear waste is not the problem you've been made to believe it is
xkcd's What If?
Would a Submarine Work as a Spaceship?
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
End of Space – Creating a Prison for Humanity
Peekaboo Kidz
What if We Lived on the Moon? | How Long Can a Human Survive on the Moon? | The Dr. Binocs Show
Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell
Why Earth Is A Prison and How To Escape It
Summary
00:00
Challenges of Sending Nuclear Waste into Space
- Nuclear waste is categorized into three levels: low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level, with high-level waste being the most dangerous and difficult to handle.
- Around 440 active nuclear reactors produce approximately 11,000 tons of high-level nuclear waste annually, accumulating to 400,000 tons since 1954.
- Launching high-level nuclear waste into space is not feasible due to cost and logistical constraints, with each reactor's waste disposal via space launch estimated to cost $100 million annually.
- The current capacity for space launches is limited, with only 35 launches in 2021, making it impossible to dispose of all nuclear waste via space transport.
- Sending nuclear waste into space poses significant challenges, including the high cost of launching, space junk management, and the risk of radioactive particles re-entering Earth's atmosphere.
- While various disposal methods exist for nuclear waste, shooting it into space is deemed one of the worst ideas due to its impracticality and potential risks.
