LoginGet started

Perseteruan Luhut Pandjaitan vs Bahlil Lahadalia dalam Pembagian IUP Batu Bara | Bocor Alus Politik

Tempodotco・25 minutes read

The text delves into the complex relationship between Luhud and Bahlil, focusing on their disagreements over the revision of PP Number 96 regarding mining permits for religious organizations, highlighting concerns over legal implications, corruption, and conflicts of interest in the distribution of permits. Political tensions arise as Commission 6 members target Bahlil for alleged violations in mining procedures, while entrepreneurs capitalize on the situation, requesting significant shares in mining activities, leading to investigations and the need to address issues of corruption and nepotism in permit distribution.

Insights

  • Luhud and Bahlil's disagreement over the revision of PP Number 96, specifically regarding mining permits for religious organizations, showcases a fundamental clash in perspectives on legal compliance and the prioritization of different entities in the mining sector.
  • The broader issue highlighted by the text is the prevalence of conflicts of interest, corruption, and nepotism in the distribution of mining permits and concessions, underscoring the necessity of addressing these systemic problems to ensure legal compliance and fair practices in the industry, ultimately preventing associated issues and maintaining ethical standards.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What sparked Jokowi's reflection on his leadership term?

    A fire incident in Barah Skam reminded Jokowi of his final leadership term, cautioning against tarnishing his legacy.

  • What was the focus of the meeting on March 13?

    A meeting on March 13 discussed the revision of PP Number 96 concerning mining permits.

  • What did Luhud emphasize regarding religious organizations and mining permits?

    Luhud emphasized the need for proper training and organization for religious organizations managing mining permits.

  • What was the alternative proposal focused on in the revision of PP 96?

    An alternative proposal focused on prioritizing mining permits for religious organizations in specific coal concession areas.

  • What concerns did the Minister of Human Resources initially have about the revision of PP96?

    The Minister of Human Resources initially had concerns about legal implications regarding the revision of PP96.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Tumultuous Relationship, Legacy Concerns, Mining Permit Revision

  • The relationship between Luhud and Bahlil has been tumultuous, with Luhud being seen as Bahlil's rival since Bahlil's appointment as Minister and Luhud's as head of BKPM.
  • A fire incident in Barah Skam reminded Jokowi of his final leadership term, cautioning against tarnishing his legacy.
  • Luhud's involvement in the mining business, particularly coal, began with learning from KPC, managed by BUMN.
  • A meeting on March 13 involving Luhud, Bahlil, and Pratikno discussed the revision of PP Number 96 concerning mining permits.
  • Bahlil pushed for immediate voting on the revision, aiming to include permits for religious mass organizations, aligning with Jokowi's political promises.
  • Luhud opposed granting special mining permits to religious organizations, citing violations of the Mineral and Coal Law.
  • The debate between Luhud and Bahlil highlighted disagreements on the revision's wording and compliance with existing laws.
  • Pratikno played a significant role in agreeing to the revision, narrowing down the scope to coal mining permits for religious organizations.
  • An alternative proposal to Article 75a, Article 83, focused on prioritizing mining permits for religious organizations in specific coal concession areas.
  • The revised PP 96 aimed to accommodate NU's coal mining permit application in PKP 2B areas like Arutmin and KPC, approved by ESDM.

15:08

Luhud's Political and Business Alliances Shift

  • Luhud is involved in business activities like mining, possibly linked to historical backgrounds and connections to KPC.
  • Luhud's relationship with Bahlil, particularly in the context of politics, has had ups and downs, with shifting support towards different political figures.
  • Luhud's current support for Erlangga Hartarto in Golkar leadership indicates a change in political alliances.
  • Luhud and Ical have a history of business closeness and political alignment, currently supporting Langga water for Golkar leadership.
  • Minister of Human Resources disagreed with the revision of PP96 initially due to concerns about legal implications, but later softened his stance.
  • PP96 revision not only regulates mining permits but also addresses contract extensions, divestment, and other interests, causing disagreements among officials.
  • Luhud opposes the revision of PP96, preferring to prioritize BUMN and BUMD in mining activities over mass organizations.
  • Luhud emphasizes the need for proper training and organization if religious organizations are to manage mining permits to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest.
  • Political dynamics in the DPR are influenced by discussions on the revocation and reinstatement of IUP, with a special Panja created to address these issues.
  • Commission 6 members are targeting Bahlil for alleged violations in mining procedures, including issues related to PSN and BSD, leading to political tensions and investigations.

29:31

Entrepreneurs seek shares, face corruption allegations.

  • Entrepreneurs have been capitalizing on the current situation, with many reaching out after a published investigation. They are commonly requesting shares ranging from 55% to 80%, although these requests are not always granted. Civil society groups like the mining advocacy network Jatam have reported alleged corruption to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), which has requested their assistance in gathering evidence for further investigation.
  • The conversation highlights the need to prevent conflicts of interest, corruption, and nepotism in the distribution of permits and concessions, especially when they are given for free without proper auctioning. Criticism is directed towards the involvement of rentiers and entrepreneurs in these processes, emphasizing the importance of addressing these issues to avoid legal violations and other associated problems.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.