Menteri Bahlil Menjawab Tudingan Penerimaan Upeti dalam Pencabutan Izin Tambang | Bocor Alus Politik

Tempodotco27 minutes read

A Task Force, led by Minister Bahlil, was established to manage investment issues and revive stalled investments, focusing on unproductive permits. The Minister clarified his role in permit revocation and emphasized the Task Force's independence from IUP data, aiming to accelerate investment and address bureaucratic challenges in the process.

Insights

  • Minister Bahlil's involvement in revoking permits raises concerns about potential influence from close associates, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in decision-making processes.
  • The Task Force, chaired by the Minister, focuses on accelerating investments by addressing unproductive permits, emphasizing the government's commitment to streamlining processes and resolving stalled investments to boost economic growth.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is the purpose of the Task Force created by the Minister?

    The Task Force was established to provide corrections in cases where the technical minister has the authority to revoke permits. It can also receive appeals from entrepreneurs, protest decisions, and revive permits. The Task Force is a powerful institution led by the Minister to accelerate investment and resolve stalled investments, focusing on unproductive permits.

  • Who is involved in revoking permits and potential influence?

    Minister Bahlil is involved in revoking permits, with potential influence from close associates. The Task Force, chaired by the Minister, has the authority to revoke and revive permits, emphasizing the importance of transparency in governance and proper procedures.

  • What is the focus of the Task Force regarding permits?

    The Task Force is not linked to IUP data revocation but focuses on unproductive permits. It aims to accelerate investment by resolving issues with permits that are causing delays in processing, potentially due to allegations of bribery and requests for permit revival.

  • What is the role of the Minister in the revocation process?

    The Minister clarifies his role in revoking permits, stating that the authority ultimately returns to the technical minister. The process for revoking permits involves verifying rules and regulations, particularly concerning PP 96, to ensure transparency and accountability in governance.

  • What are the challenges faced by entrepreneurs in obtaining permits?

    Entrepreneurs face challenges in obtaining permits, such as lacking necessary permissions like RKB and IBPK. The process for obtaining permits, specifically IPPK, has been ongoing since 2015-2016, with delays potentially caused by the technical ministry. Allegations of bribery and requests for permit revival further complicate the process, emphasizing the need for transparency and adherence to proper procedures.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Task Force Revokes and Revives Permits

  • Task Force created to provide corrections where technical minister has authority to revoke permits
  • Task Force can receive appeals from entrepreneurs, protest, and revive permits
  • Task Force can revoke and revive permits, powerful institution
  • Minister Bahlil involved in revoking permits, potential influence from close associates
  • Interview with Minister of Investment regarding press council's decision on nickel permits
  • Minister clarifies error in press coverage regarding number of revoked permits
  • Task Force led by Minister to accelerate investment, resolve stalled investments
  • Task Force not linked to IUP data revocation, focuses on unproductive permits
  • Presidential Task Force Decree on investment management chaired by Minister
  • Minister clarifies role in revoking permits, authority returning to technical minister

15:32

Entrepreneur's permit issues hinder business operations.

  • Permits are not allowed to be made at the bank, specifically the IUB at IPO.
  • Money in the dipo is not for entrepreneurs but for other businesses.
  • The entrepreneur is a pilot but lacks necessary permissions like RKB and IBPK.
  • Without BPK permission, revoking the entrepreneur is not possible.
  • The entrepreneur's name is known, but he is not operating due to lacking permissions.
  • The entrepreneur has not taken care of IPPK, indicating a deliberate desire to sell IUP.
  • The process for IPPK has been ongoing since 2015-2016.
  • The technical ministry may be at fault for delays in processing IPPK.
  • Allegations of bribery and share requests for permit revival have surfaced.
  • The Supreme Court protects sources from punishment, emphasizing the importance of transparency in governance.

29:12

Debating obligations, rules, and press freedom

  • The discussion revolves around the proposal of an obligation, with a focus on verifying rules and regulations, particularly concerning PP 96.
  • There is a mention of potential additions to an article for mass organizations, with an emphasis on the ongoing process and the need for meaningful debates.
  • The conversation touches on issues related to freedom of the press, activism, and the importance of following proper procedures, especially in the context of the Ministry of Investment and political nominations for the future.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.