Why People Aren't Deploying to Vercel Anymore
Josh tried coding・6 minutes read
Versel offers user-friendly deployment platforms like Next.js but faces competition from AWS Amplify due to cost-effectiveness at scale, prompting users to consider alternative options to avoid unexpected expenses.
Insights
- Users are shifting from Versel to AWS for deploying Next.js apps due to AWS's improved user experience and resources available for guidance, marking a significant change in the deployment platform preferences within the developer community.
- Versel's pricing structure, especially concerning bandwidth costs, can lead to unexpected expenses at scale, prompting users to consider AWS Amplify as a cost-effective alternative with more predictable scaling and pricing options, highlighting the importance of evaluating different platforms for long-term financial sustainability.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What are some innovative products developed by the Versel team?
Next.js and Vercel Kit
Related videos
Summary
00:00
Versel vs AWS Amplify: Deployment Cost Comparison
- Versel team has developed innovative products like Next.js and Vercel Kit, offering a user-friendly deployment platform for various frameworks such as Nexus, simplifying the deployment process significantly with just a few clicks required.
- Historically, Versel was a popular deployment platform due to exclusive features like ISR, but now, many are shifting towards AWS for deploying Nexjs apps, with resources available to guide users through the process, which has improved user experience compared to AWS's previous reputation.
- Versel's pricing can become expensive at scale, especially due to bandwidth costs, with examples of users facing hefty bills, while AWS Amplify offers more predictable scaling and pricing options, making it a preferred alternative for many.
- While Versel is known for its intuitive deployment process, it's essential to consider alternatives like AWS Amplify for cost-effectiveness at scale, as Versel's pricing structure can lead to unexpected expenses, prompting users to explore other options for their applications.
