Why It's a Relief to Follow a Leader with Malignant Narcissism | FRANK YEOMANS
BorderlinerNotes・3 minutes read
During Obama's time, there was a push for integration in the US, but the narrative shifted with the idea of excluding Mexicans to "make America great again." The concept of splitting, simplifying situations into good and bad, is common in sports and movies, but it becomes dangerous when applied to politics, with leaders influencing integration or splitting within groups through self-aggrandizement and false narratives.
Insights
- The shift from promoting integration under Obama to exclusionary rhetoric targeting Mexicans during subsequent presidencies demonstrates how political narratives can impact societal inclusivity and perpetuate simplistic views of good versus bad.
- The concept of splitting, seen in sports rivalries and movies, can be entertaining but becomes perilous when applied to politics, creating divisions and oversimplifications that can be exploited by leaders exhibiting traits of 'malignant narcissism' to manipulate and mislead the public.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
How did Obama's presidency impact minority groups?
Obama's presidency fostered a sense of integration among various minority groups in the United States, leading them to feel more included in society.
What is the concept of splitting in daily life?
The concept of splitting involves simplifying complex situations by categorizing them into good and bad, a common occurrence in various aspects of life such as sports rivalries and blockbuster movies.
How do leaders influence group dynamics?
Leaders play a crucial role in either fostering integration or splitting within groups, shaping the overall dynamics and interactions among individuals.
What is the significance of 'malignant narcissism' in leadership?
'Malignant narcissism' highlights the dangerous combination of self-aggrandizement, aggression, and destruction, showcasing how leaders like Hitler can lead individuals astray with false narratives of grandiosity.
How did the narrative shift during the idea of excluding Mexicans?
The narrative shifted during the idea of excluding Mexicans to make America great again, appealing to a simplistic view of good versus bad, altering the sense of integration felt during Obama's presidency.
Related videos
TalkTV
The Madness of Crowds? Julia Hartley-Brewer meets Douglas Murray
Democracy Now!
"Decade of Betrayal": How the U.S. Expelled Over a Half Million U.S. Citizens to Mexico in 1930s
DailyWire+
How The $%#@& Are We Going To Get Along? feat. Michael Knowles
Tom Bilyeu
CIA Spy On WW3, Jeffrey Epstein, Israel-Hamas, AI & Social Media Brainwashing | Andrew Bustamante
LiveNOW from FOX
WATCH: Candace Owens Opening Statement At U.S. House Hearing
Summary
00:00
"Integration vs. Splitting: Leadership's Impact"
- During Obama's presidency, there was a sense of integration in the United States, with various minority groups feeling more included in society. However, the narrative shifted with the idea of excluding Mexicans to make America great again, appealing to a simplistic view of good versus bad.
- The concept of splitting, where individuals simplify complex situations by categorizing them into good and bad, is common in various aspects of life, from sports rivalries like Red Sox versus Yankees to blockbuster movies. While this can be entertaining, it becomes dangerous when applied to political stances.
- Leaders play a crucial role in fostering integration or splitting within groups. The mention of 'malignant narcissism' highlights the dangerous combination of self-aggrandizement, aggression, and destruction, with leaders like Hitler exemplifying how individuals can be led astray by false narratives of grandiosity.
