U.S. laws aren't keeping up with spread of hate online, says civil rights advocate

PBS NewsHour2 minutes read

The rise in violent hate crimes, particularly from white supremacist groups, has sparked calls for greater government and tech company accountability, as noted by Eileen Hershenov and Dr. Mohammad Abu-Salha. Kristen Clarke emphasized the need for stronger laws and collaboration with civil rights organizations to combat the spread of hate speech online and ensure better protections for all Americans.

Insights

  • The discussions led by Judy Woodruff and Amna Nawaz reveal a troubling trend of rising violent hate crimes globally, particularly linked to white supremacist groups, which accounted for a staggering 78% of domestic extremist-related murders in the past year, as reported by Eileen Hershenov from the Anti-Defamation League. This alarming statistic underscores the urgency for government intervention, as emphasized by Dr. Mohammad Abu-Salha, who called on Congress to take decisive action to protect all Americans from hate-fueled violence.
  • Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, stressed the importance of holding tech companies accountable for their role in the spread of hate online, advocating for stronger laws and increased collaboration with civil rights organizations. Clarke's insights highlight the necessity for tech companies to enhance their efforts in combating online hate by investing resources and diversifying decision-making processes to effectively address the complexities of hate in today's digital landscape.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is a hate crime?

    A hate crime is a criminal act motivated by bias against a particular group, often based on race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or other characteristics. These crimes can take various forms, including physical violence, vandalism, or threats, and they are particularly concerning because they not only harm the individual victim but also instill fear in the broader community associated with that group. The impact of hate crimes extends beyond the immediate victim, as they can create a climate of fear and division within society. Understanding hate crimes is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies and fostering a more inclusive environment.

  • How can I report a hate crime?

    Reporting a hate crime typically involves contacting local law enforcement or a dedicated hate crime hotline. It is important to provide as much detail as possible about the incident, including the time, location, and nature of the crime, as well as any information about the perpetrator. Many communities also have organizations that specialize in supporting victims of hate crimes, which can offer guidance on the reporting process and provide additional resources. Additionally, documenting the incident through photographs or written accounts can be helpful. Engaging with local advocacy groups can also amplify the report and raise awareness about hate crimes in the community.

  • What are the effects of hate speech?

    Hate speech can have profound effects on individuals and society as a whole. It can perpetuate stereotypes, incite violence, and contribute to a culture of intolerance and discrimination. Victims of hate speech may experience emotional distress, fear, and a sense of isolation, which can lead to broader societal divisions. Furthermore, hate speech can embolden extremist groups and normalize harmful ideologies, making it essential to address and counteract such rhetoric. The challenge lies in balancing the need to protect free speech while also safeguarding individuals and communities from the damaging consequences of hate speech.

  • What is the role of social media in hate crimes?

    Social media plays a significant role in the proliferation of hate crimes by providing a platform for hate groups to spread their messages, recruit new members, and coordinate activities. The rapid dissemination of information online can amplify extremist ideologies and facilitate the radicalization of individuals. Additionally, social media can serve as a tool for broadcasting attacks, as seen in various incidents where perpetrators have live-streamed their actions. This raises critical questions about the responsibility of tech companies to monitor and regulate content on their platforms to prevent the spread of hate and violence while also navigating the complexities of free speech.

  • How can tech companies combat online hate?

    Tech companies can combat online hate by implementing stricter content moderation policies, investing in advanced technologies to detect and remove hate speech, and collaborating with civil rights organizations to better understand the impact of their platforms. Increasing diversity within decision-making teams can also help ensure that a variety of perspectives are considered when addressing issues related to hate. Furthermore, companies should prioritize transparency in their policies and actions, allowing users to understand how hate speech is defined and managed. By taking these steps, tech companies can play a crucial role in reducing the prevalence of hate online and fostering a safer digital environment.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Rising Hate Crimes and Social Media's Role

  • The rise in violent hate crimes globally has prompted discussions on how hate groups exploit social media to spread messages of hate, radicalize individuals, and broadcast attacks, as highlighted by Judy Woodruff and Amna Nawaz in a recent report.
  • Eileen Hershenov from the Anti-Defamation League reported that white supremacists accounted for 54% of domestic extremist-related murders over the past decade, with that figure increasing to 78% in the last year, indicating a significant rise in violence linked to these groups.
  • Dr. Mohammad Abu-Salha, whose family was a victim of a hate crime in 2015, urged Congress to take action to prevent further tragedies, emphasizing the need for government intervention to protect all Americans from hate-fueled violence.
  • The hearing was prompted by the New Zealand mosque shootings, where a white supremacist killed 50 people, and discussed the role of social media in enabling such acts, with Facebook's Neil Potts stating that they removed the shooter's live-stream within 10 minutes of being notified.
  • Concerns were raised about tech companies like Facebook and Google potentially stifling free speech by banning hate speech, with Congressman Tom McClintock arguing that suppressing hate speech could inadvertently strengthen its influence.
  • Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, highlighted the need for stronger laws to hold tech companies accountable for allowing hate to proliferate online, stressing that current laws have not kept pace with the digital landscape.
  • Clarke described the lengthy advocacy process that led to Facebook banning discussions on white nationalism, revealing that it took significant effort to convince the company to recognize the dangers of white nationalist ideologies, which she argued are interchangeable with white supremacist ideologies.
  • To combat online hate, Clarke recommended that tech companies invest more resources, increase diversity in decision-making, and collaborate with civil rights organizations to better understand and address the realities of hate in society.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.