What is the main criticism of "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald"?

Terrible movie despite high budget

Who is the protagonist in the first "Fantastic Beasts" movie?

Newt Scamander, magical creature collector

Orphan boy with dangerous powers

Relatable, not typical hero figure

Conflict between Grindelwald and Dumbledore

"Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald" faces criticism for its convoluted plot, inconsistent character portrayals, and numerous retcons, resulting in a low rating of three out of ten.
The movie introduces questionable elements like the forced inclusion of characters, unresolved plot points, and contradictory character actions, leading to an overall messy and unsatisfactory viewing experience.

What is the main criticism of "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald"?
Terrible movie despite high budget
Who is the protagonist in the first "Fantastic Beasts" movie?
Newt Scamander, magical creature collector
What is the subplot involving in the first "Fantastic Beasts" movie?
Orphan boy with dangerous powers
How is Newt Scamander's character portrayed in "Fantastic Beasts"?
Relatable, not typical hero figure
What is the conflict in the sequel "Crimes of Grindelwald"?
Conflict between Grindelwald and Dumbledore

00:00

"Fantastic Beasts to the Crimes of Grindelwald" is criticized as a terrible movie, despite its high budget.
The first movie in the series follows Newt Scamander, a magical creature collector, in New York City.
Newt encounters various characters, including a non-magical human, a magical cop, and a mind-reading woman.
A subplot involves an orphan boy with dangerous powers, leading to a reveal of Grindelwald's evil identity.
The first movie is not overly complex and is appreciated by some for its departure from typical Harry Potter themes.
Newt's character is highlighted for being relatable and not the typical hero figure.
The sequel, "Crimes of Grindelwald," delves into the conflict between Grindelwald and Dumbledore.
Newt is roped into the conflict despite his lack of suitability for the task, raising questions about his involvement.
The sequel introduces questionable plot points, like Ezra Miller's survival after a supposed fatal explosion.
The movie's tone fluctuates between dark and light moments, creating inconsistency in the storytelling.

13:09

Newt is unwillingly involved in a conflict, leading to the forced inclusion of Jacob and Queeny in the story.
Jacob's memories return, revealing the memory-wiping potion only erased bad memories, which he lacked.
Queenie manipulates Jacob into marriage against his will, portraying her as a psychopath, contradicting her previous characterization.
Tina is upset with Newt due to fake news about his engagement, a plot point deemed irrelevant.
Nagini, Voldemort's snake, is introduced as a human circus performer, with a backstory claimed to be conceived 20 years ago by J.K. Rowling.
Newt and Jacob use a portkey to reach Paris, where they meet Kama, who kidnaps Tina and attempts the same with Newt.
Newt catches a new creature, emphasizing the "Fantastic Beasts" aspect of the movie.
Dumbledore declines to fight Grindelwald, leading to his removal from the movie, with inconsistencies like Professor McGonagall's presence.
Flashbacks reveal convoluted family ties between characters, culminating in a chaotic scene at a crypt where Grindelwald hosts a wizard rally.
Grindelwald justifies killing muggles to prevent World War II, with Queenie siding with him despite witnessing his violence, leading to a destructive battle.

26:47

JK Rowling and David Yates present a convoluted mess in "Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald," with characters acting differently, unrelated plot events, numerous retcons, and plot holes, earning only three out of ten points for the movie.