The burden of proof
QualiaSoup (archive)・10 minutes read
Claims require evidence for support, especially supernatural and divine existence claims, placing the burden of proof on claim-makers, not skeptics to disprove them. Eliminating alternatives is key when rejecting inadequate answers, highlighting the importance of substantiating factual claims to be considered valid.
Insights
- The burden of proof lies with the individual making a factual claim, not with skeptics to disprove it, emphasizing the importance of evidence in supporting assertions.
- Claim-makers, especially regarding supernatural or divine existence claims, must provide evidence to support their assertions, highlighting the necessity of proof for extraordinary claims to be considered valid.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
How should individuals support supernatural claims?
By providing evidence to back their assertions.
What is the burden of proof in making factual claims?
It lies with the claim-maker.
How should individuals approach divine existence claims?
By substantiating them like any other claim.
What is the role of skeptics in evaluating claims?
They are not obligated to disprove claims.
Why is it important to eliminate alternatives when rejecting answers?
To strengthen the credibility of the chosen answer.
Related videos
Summary
00:00
"Burden of proof for supernatural claims"
- Investigating a claim about a werewalrus on Pluto sending psychic messages is beyond current technology's limits.
- The burden of proof lies with the individual making a factual claim, not with skeptics to disprove it.
- Encyclopedias don't include claims without evidence, as claims must be supported to be considered factual.
- When making supernatural claims, individuals must provide evidence to support their assertions.
- Claim-makers must support their claims; skeptics are not obligated to disprove them.
- Divine existence claims must be substantiated like any other answer, not given a free pass.
- Rejecting inadequate answers doesn't require knowing the exact answer; eliminating alternatives is crucial.
- The burden of proof lies with the claim-maker, not with skeptics to disprove divine existence.
- Those making supernatural claims must provide evidence to support their assertions, as extraordinary claims require proof.
