Sword Expert Reacts To The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
IGN・14 minutes read
In a detailed analysis, Matt Easton critiques the battle of the Pelinor Fields in "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King," pointing out inconsistencies and impracticalities in the weapons and tactics used. He praises the historical basis for the use of giant elephants in the battle but criticizes the unrealistic portrayal of certain combat elements, such as Eowyn's ability to penetrate an elephant's hide with a sword.
Insights
- Matt Easton critiques the impracticality of weapons and tactics in "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King," highlighting issues like riders of Rohan not holding shields on horseback and bows' inefficacy against horses.
- The historical accuracy and intricate details of weapons like the Witch King's flail and the design of replica swords from "The Lord of the Rings" series, blending history and fantasy, make them highly appealing to fans and collectors.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What does Matt Easton specialize in?
Longsword and saber fencing
What does Matt Easton critique in "The Lord of the Rings" battle scene?
Unwieldiness of weapons
What historical basis does Matt Easton cite for giant elephants in battle?
Warfare
What does Matt Easton praise in the design of replica swords from "The Lord of the Rings"?
Historical and fantasy-inspired beauty
What does Matt Easton analyze about the Witch King's weapon in combat?
Historical accuracy and practicality
Related videos
IGN
Sword Expert Reacts To The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Nerd of the Rings
A Long-expected Review: The Rings of Power Season 1
Insider
Ancient-Warfare Expert Rates 10 More Battle Tactics In Movies And TV | How Real Is It? | Insider
Despot of Antrim
Rings of Power: The Anti-Lord of the Rings
Skallagrim
The swords in Lord of the Rings - Would they be practical in real life?