SUPERCUT: Josh Hawley Shows No Mercy To Key Biden Judicial Nominees | 2023 Rewind

Forbes Breaking News・2 minutes read

Mr. Delany is questioned for exposing Chessie's name in a sexual assault case, leading to accusations of intimidation and threats. Senator Holly engages with various nominees on issues like rebuilding post offices, sentencing guidelines, and views on race-based admissions and COVID-19 origins.

Insights

  • Mr. Delany's decision to expose Chessie's name in the St. Paul's case is criticized for potentially endangering her and intimidating her family, despite the school's initial intent for anonymity.
  • The nominee's refusal to provide relevant documents, as well as concerns raised about their behavior and stonewalling, indicates a lack of transparency and accountability in the nomination process, impacting the nominee's credibility and suitability for the position.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What controversy surrounds Mr. Delany in the St. Paul's case?

    The controversy surrounding Mr. Delany in the St. Paul's case revolves around his decision to expose Chessie's name to the media, potentially putting her at risk of threats and intimidation. Despite the school's initial intent for the case to proceed with anonymity, Mr. Delany's actions have raised questions about his conduct and accountability in the situation.

  • What is the focus of Senator Cornin's questioning of Ms. Shogun?

    Senator Cornin's questioning of Ms. Shogun centers around her public Twitter posts, particularly those criticizing the lifting of mask requirements for children and advocating for an assault weapons ban. Ms. Shogun repeatedly refers to her social media as personal, avoiding direct answers to questions about her controversial posts, leading to further scrutiny from the senator.

  • What concerns does the individual express about the nominee's behavior?

    The individual expresses concerns about the nominee's misleading behavior, stonewalling the committee, and allegations of partisan conduct, abuse, and racial derogatory remarks. They request relevant documents from the nominee before a final vote is taken, highlighting the seriousness of the allegations and the need for transparency in the process.

  • What is the focus of Senator Tillis' questioning of nominee Federico?

    Senator Tillis' questioning of nominee Federico revolves around the sentencing guidelines in a case where Federico recommended a sentence significantly lower than the guidelines range for a defendant involved in child exploitation. The senator criticizes Federico's sentencing recommendation, leading to opposition to his nomination based on these decisions.

  • What is the main topic of discussion between Senator Holly and the nominees?

    The main topics of discussion between Senator Holly and the nominees include rebuilding rural post offices after natural disasters, involvement with organizations like The Greenlining Institute, views on Supreme Court rulings on race-based admissions, prosecuting cases involving child sex abuse material, and condemning violence against Jewish people. These discussions cover a range of important issues relevant to the nominees' roles and responsibilities.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

"Debate over Mr. Delany's actions"

  • Mr. Delany's conduct in the St. Paul's case is questioned by the speaker, highlighting the attempt to bring the case into the media by stripping anonymity from Chessie, a 16-year-old girl.
  • The speaker accuses Mr. Delany of attempting to intimidate Chessie and her family by exposing her name to the media, potentially leading to threats and intimidation.
  • Mr. Delany defends the school's intent, stating that the school wanted the case to proceed with anonymity, despite the motion filed to strip Chessie's anonymity.
  • Chessie's letter to the committee is referenced, where she expresses defiance against Mr. Delany's tactics and the pressure on survivors of sexual assault to remain silent.
  • The speaker challenges Mr. Delany's decision to strip Chessie's anonymity, emphasizing the impact on her life as a survivor of sexual assault.
  • The speaker questions Mr. Delany's accountability for forcing Chessie to reveal her name and the potential risks she faced due to his actions.
  • Senator Cornin questions Ms. Shogun about her public Twitter posts, highlighting posts criticizing the lifting of mask requirements for children and advocating for an assault weapons ban.
  • Ms. Shogun repeatedly refers to her social media as personal, avoiding direct answers to questions about her controversial Twitter posts.
  • Senator Cornin confronts Ms. Shogun about her refusal to provide her public posts to the committee, accusing her of lying under oath and stonewalling.
  • Senator Hol questions Ms. Shogun about her association with Engage Action and their statements regarding Israel, emphasizing her personal support for Israel and her work with Israeli entrepreneurs.

15:49

Engagement with Israel and Whistleblower Allegations

  • The individual has not clearly stated their position on Israel but has engaged with Israel in various capacities.
  • They do not believe Israel is an apartheid state and their work with Israeli businesses and entrepreneurs reflects this.
  • They do not equate Israel with terrorist organizations like Hamas and the Taliban.
  • Engage Action called for a ceasefire, stating that Israel is an occupier in relation to Palestinians.
  • The individual emphasizes their engagement with the Jewish community and Israeli businesses.
  • They avoid directly answering whether they agree with Israel being an occupier.
  • The individual expresses concerns about a nominee's misleading behavior and stonewalling the committee.
  • Whistleblower allegations against the nominee include partisan conduct, abuse, and racial derogatory remarks.
  • The individual requests relevant documents from the nominee before a final vote is taken.
  • The nominee has litigated against religious liberty claims, including a case involving COVID-19 restrictions on churches and mass protests.

29:49

Senate Nominee Hearings: Religious Discrimination and Sentencing

  • Recent Supreme Court clarification on religious test application to COVID-19 restrictions discussed.
  • Questioning of nominee Tanden on discrimination based on religious faith.
  • Tanden's defense of representing the mayor's orders for public health protection.
  • Senator's disagreement with Tanden's argument on religious people posing higher infection risk.
  • Lack of scientific evidence in Tanden's defense of discrimination based on religious belief.
  • Senator's disappointment in Tanden's persistent defense of discriminatory arguments.
  • Senator Tillis questioning nominee Federico on sentencing guidelines in a case.
  • Federico's recommendation of a sentence significantly lower than the guidelines range.
  • Senator's criticism of Federico's sentencing recommendation for a defendant involved in child exploitation.
  • Senator's opposition to Federico's nomination based on sentencing decisions.
  • Senator Holly's discussion with nominee Tub on the importance of rebuilding rural post offices after natural disasters.
  • Tub's agreement on prioritizing rebuilding rural post offices for community connectivity.
  • Senator Holly's inquiry with nominee Okocha on his involvement with The Greenlining Institute and views on Supreme Court's rulings on race-based admissions.
  • Okocha's commitment to applying binding precedent in cases if confirmed as a judge.
  • Senator Holly's questioning of nominee Okocha on his experience prosecuting cases involving child sex abuse material and the severity of penalties for offenders.

44:15

Senate Hearing: Nominees Address Controversial Issues

  • The text involves a discussion between Senator Holly and nominees, focusing on various issues.
  • Judge Kill is questioned about his involvement with The Asian-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, specifically regarding their statements supporting Palestinian communities.
  • Judge Kill states he hasn't been involved with the group for a long time and is not familiar with the specific statement mentioned.
  • Senator Holly questions Judge Kill about condemning calls for the elimination of Israel, to which Judge Kill responds cautiously, stating it's a complex issue and he hasn't studied it extensively.
  • Senator Holly presses Judge Kill to condemn violence against Jewish people, to which Judge Kill agrees that any violence should be condemned.
  • Senator Holly questions Mr. Fonzone about his work for entities related to the People's Republic of China during the Hong Kong protests, seeking clarification on his involvement in advising on messaging during the protests.
  • Mr. Fonzone denies advising the trade council on issues related to the protests and states his work focused on advising companies on American law.
  • Senator Holly expresses concern about the White House pressuring social media companies to censor protected speech, referencing a court case, and questions Mr. Coker about his stance on such actions.
  • Mr. Coker emphasizes his support for the First Amendment and privacy, stating he does not see a role for the Office of the National Cyber Director in censorship.
  • Senator Holly questions Mr. Coker about his involvement in discussions regarding ODNI's obligation to declassify information about the origins of COVID-19, highlighting the lack of compliance with statutory obligations.

59:25

Government Transparency and Legal Compliance in COVID-19

  • The Law requires the government to be honest with the public about what they know, similar to COVID-19.
  • Mr. Cooker commits to complying with statutes enacted by Congress.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.