Snowden: They Are Watching You
Learn Liberty・2 minutes read
The speaker discusses the history of America's independence and the implications of revealing secrets, emphasizing the abuse of surveillance powers and the importance of journalism in exposing government misconduct. The text explores surveillance laws, government collaboration with digital companies, and the debate between liberty and security, highlighting the significance of whistleblowers and the need to protect individual rights amidst growing concerns about privacy and government control.
Insights
- The birth of America involved criminality and treason, with the speaker underscoring the risks faced by its founders and the implications of revealing secrets or declaring independence.
- Surveillance technologies have evolved significantly, enabling extensive tracking and storage of private data that poses a threat to privacy and democratic control.
- Whistleblowers and journalists play a crucial role in uncovering government misconduct, safeguarding against unchecked power, and the necessity of adversarial journalism in exposing wrongdoing is emphasized.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What is the significance of whistleblowers?
Whistleblowers play a crucial role in exposing government misconduct.
How does surveillance impact privacy?
Surveillance technologies pose a threat to privacy and democratic control.
What is the role of adversarial journalism?
Adversarial journalism is crucial in uncovering government wrongdoing.
How do governments justify surveillance?
Governments often justify surveillance under the guise of national security.
What are the implications of government collaboration with digital companies?
Government collaboration with digital companies raises concerns about influence and control.
Related videos
FRONTLINE PBS | Official
United States of Secrets, Part One (full documentary) | FRONTLINE
The Guardian
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: 'I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things'
South China Morning Post
Snowden spy leaks shook the world, a decade later, what’s changed?
FRONTLINE PBS | Official
United States of Secrets, Part One (full documentary) | FRONTLINE
Jordan B Peterson
I Spoke Before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee
Summary
00:00
"Surveillance, Power, and Government Misconduct Exposed"
- The speaker introduces the historical context of America, highlighting the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the risks faced by those who drafted it.
- The speaker emphasizes the criminality and treason involved in the birth of the nation, discussing the implications of revealing secrets or declaring independence.
- The discussion shifts to the topic of surveillance and power, noting that information is sought for control rather than curiosity.
- Surveillance technologies have advanced, allowing for extensive tracking and storage of private data, posing a threat to privacy and democratic control.
- The speaker, with a background in military and intelligence work, raises concerns about the abuse of surveillance powers by governments.
- The UK's Investigatory Powers Bill is cited as an extreme example of authoritarian surveillance legislation.
- The failure of oversight mechanisms in the US government is highlighted, with instances of officials lying under oath and lack of consequences.
- The importance of whistleblowers and journalists in exposing government misconduct is stressed as a safeguard against unchecked power.
- The speaker warns of the dangers of governments suppressing journalism and the need for a free press to hold power accountable.
- The discussion concludes with a reflection on the necessity of adversarial journalism in uncovering government wrongdoing, including instances of torture and human rights violations.
17:43
"Intelligence Oversight, Civil Disobedience, and Privacy Rights"
- The CIA torture program was exposed by journalist John Kiriakou, who was the only American to go to jail for revealing it.
- The FBI investigated a US citizen, a religious leader, as a national security threat, despite being born in the US.
- Reforms post the Church Committee in 1975 aimed to provide oversight on intelligence agencies but have shown signs of failure over time.
- Members of intelligence oversight committees receive significant campaign contributions from intelligence agencies, potentially impacting their oversight.
- Governments tend to conceal information under the guise of national security, using euphemisms to justify actions that may not align with public interests.
- Russia and China have passed intrusive surveillance laws, reflecting a global trend towards fear-based politics.
- A shift towards legalism prioritizes legality over morality, leading to the erosion of historical prohibitions and rights.
- Henry David Thoreau advocated for civil disobedience as a moral duty when laws conflict with individual conscience.
- Upholding basic liberties and privacy rights may require disobeying laws that are deemed unjust or immoral.
- Change and progress in society often require demands and resistance against powerful entities that may resist reforms.
33:47
Protecting Constitutional Values Through Whistleblowing and Journalism
- Constitutional values are being questioned without solid justifications, leading to concerns about their protection.
- The Constitution's power lies in people defending it, not in the document itself.
- Leaks are seen as individuals risking consequences to uphold their beliefs and oaths.
- Edward Snowden emphasizes the ethical responsibility of journalists and whistleblowers to protect deployed troops.
- Snowden did not publish any documents himself but provided evidence of wrongdoing to journalists.
- Journalists had to independently assess the public interest of each story before publishing.
- Snowden ensured the government had a chance to argue against publication to prevent harm.
- No evidence has been presented that anyone was harmed due to Snowden's disclosures.
- Snowden advocates for the importance of press freedom and informed consent in a democracy.
- Snowden believes bad journalism and undue influence in media should be countered with critical thinking and more speech, not censorship.
48:23
Government collaboration with tech companies for control.
- Throughout history, nobles and aristocrats competed with kings for power, with nobles controlling wealth and kings authority.
- Companies like Facebook, Google, and Amazon collect vast amounts of information with user consent, prompting a question on government competition with them.
- The government aims to co-opt influential companies like Facebook and Google rather than compete with them.
- The NSA's strategy, as revealed by the CIA's CTO Gus Hunt in 2013, was to collect and retain all data indefinitely.
- The government collaborated with major internet companies through programs like PRISM, obtaining access to customer records beyond legal requirements.
- AT&T's involvement in unconstitutional spying led to the Protect America Act in 2008, granting retroactive immunity for past violations.
- AT&T began collecting and storing customer data from 1987 onwards, selling it to the government without requiring warrants.
- The government's approach is about collaboration with digital companies, not competition, to maintain influence and control.
- The NSA's upstream surveillance involves intercepting data as it crosses internet service providers, telecommunications companies, and data centers.
- The debate on surveillance revolves around liberty versus surveillance, with privacy increasing security and surveillance preying on vulnerability.
01:02:44
Government Surveillance: Intrusive, Ineffective, and Unjustified
- The least intrusive means of investigation necessary should be used to achieve investigative purposes.
- The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) was established in the 1970s as part of a grand bargain, with judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
- The FISC approved warrants requested by the government approximately 33,900 times over 33 years, with only 11 rejections.
- Surveillance laws allow for emergency provisions, such as wiretapping before obtaining a warrant, providing flexibility for urgent situations.
- Mass surveillance programs, including those revealed in 2013, have not been proven to save lives or significantly impact counter-terrorism efforts.
- The Bush-era warrantless wiretapping program, Stellar Wind, was split into two parts, with one continuing secretly despite being deemed unlawful.
- The government's mass surveillance programs have not shown concrete benefits in terrorism investigations, raising questions about their justification.
- Mass surveillance is valuable for espionage, diplomatic manipulation, economic espionage, and social influence, rather than solely for counter-terrorism purposes.
- The government's struggle to control classified information, as seen in various leaks and hacks, raises concerns about data privacy and security.
- Corporations are also collecting and potentially abusing personal data, with legal uncertainties surrounding the use of such information.
01:16:39
Illegal Spying on Law Firms Revealed
- Australians shared spying tactics targeting US law firms unlawfully
- No legal consequences for spying on law firms
- Surveillance aimed at trade negotiation between Indonesia and Australia over shrimp and clove cigarettes
- Hacking phone cards for communication security keys
- Legal access to data through Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties bypassed
- Canada also engaged in similar surveillance activities
- Focus on collecting information from internet sources
- Discussion on balancing national security and individual rights
- Encouragement for whistleblowers to speak out against injustice and immorality
