Lewis Video Lecture FULL
Phil Uploads・15 minutes read
CS Lewis advocates for retributive justice over the humanitarian theory, emphasizing proportional penalties for bad actions and the importance of "Just Desserts" in punishment to avoid dehumanization and loss of individual rights. He warns against the dangers of prioritizing deterrence over justice, criticizing the reliance on elite experts and moral busybodies in shaping societal norms.
Insights
- CS Lewis favored retributive justice over the humanitarian theory, emphasizing proportional penalties for crimes as a way to ensure justice while respecting the rights of individuals.
- He cautioned against the potential dangers of humanitarian approaches that prioritize societal control over individual rights, warning against the risks of turning punishment into a tool for social engineering and the punishment of innocent individuals for the sake of deterrence.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What did CS Lewis advocate for in the criminal justice system?
Retributive justice with proportional penalties for bad actions.
Related videos
Harvard University
Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 08: "WHATS A FAIR START?"
Phil Uploads
Menninger Video Lecture FULL
Harvard University
Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 02: "PUTTING A PRICE TAG ON LIFE"
Harvard University
Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 09: "ARGUING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION"
George Tsouris
Legal Realism: how law really works
Summary
00:00
CS Lewis Advocates Retributive Justice Over Rehabilitation
- CS Lewis, known for his fiction works like The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, also delved into nonfiction essays and social criticism.
- In a debate on capital punishment in Great Britain, Lewis focused on the purpose of punishment in general rather than the specific question of capital punishment.
- He explored the dichotomy between retributive justice, which involves proportional penalties for bad actions, and the humanitarian theory of justice, which aims at rehabilitating criminals.
- Lewis favored retributive justice, believing in proportional penalties for bad actions, despite appearing harsh, with a primary concern for the criminals themselves.
- Critiquing the humanitarian theory, Lewis highlighted its focus on deterrence and mending criminals, which he found to be dehumanizing and unmerciful.
- He emphasized the importance of "Just Desserts," the idea that punishment should be proportional to the crime committed, linking justice and punishment.
- Lewis argued that the absence of Just Desserts in the humanitarian theory could lead to indefinite therapy and a loss of individual rights, turning punishment into a tool for societal control.
- He criticized the reliance on elite experts in the humanitarian theory, as it could lead to severe and invasive treatments, disregarding the rights of the individual.
- Lewis warned against the dangers of humanitarian theories that prioritize deterrence over justice, potentially leading to the punishment of innocent individuals for the sake of societal impact.
- Ultimately, Lewis advocated for a system that respects individual rights and avoids social engineering, preferring imperfect laws over the constant manipulation of citizens by moral busybodies.
18:00
Beware Humanitarianism: Mercy without Justice breeds tyranny.
- CS Lewis warns against the dangers of humanitarians who seek to perfect society through moral standards, as he believes this can lead to tyranny. He argues that mercy without justice can become unmerciful, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the concept of Just Desserts in the criminal justice system.
