Leibniz’ Contingency Argument
drcraigvideos・2 minutes read
Gottfried Leibniz argues that God is the explanation for the existence of the universe, as everything must have a reason for being, and the universe falls into the contingent category, requiring a non-contingent being like God for its existence. Leibniz concludes that the universe's cause is a non-physical, immaterial, and non-contingent entity, leading him to believe that God is the ultimate reason for the universe's existence.
Insights
- Leibniz argues that the universe's existence requires an explanation, and he posits that this explanation must be a non-contingent being like God, leading to the conclusion that God is the ultimate cause of the universe.
- Leibniz emphasizes the necessity of a non-physical, immaterial entity to explain the existence of the universe, categorizing it as contingent and requiring a non-contingent explanation, thus pointing towards the existence of God as the ultimate cause.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What is the explanation for the universe's existence?
God
Who questions the existence of the universe?
Gottfried Leibniz
What categories does Leibniz distinguish between?
Necessarily and contingently existing things
What qualities must the universe's cause possess according to Leibniz?
Non-physical, immaterial, and non-contingent
Where does Leibniz propose the universe's explanation lies?
In God
Related videos
Hoover Institution
Stephen Meyer on Intelligent Design and The Return of the God Hypothesis
CrashCourse
Intelligent Design: Crash Course Philosophy #11
Alex O'Connor
'I Think, Therefore God Exists' | The Ontological Argument (AFG #5)
CrashCourse
Aquinas & the Cosmological Arguments: Crash Course Philosophy #10
Closer To Truth
Why is There "Something" Rather than "Nothing"? | Episode 306 | Closer To Truth