Judge raises his voice while questioning Trump's attorneys
CNN・2 minutes read
The judge questioned Trump's legal team's accusation of misconduct against the district attorney's office, emphasizing the need for evidence and case law to support such serious claims. Despite the delay in the trial due to document handover, the judge maintained a strict adherence to legal procedures and a refusal to accept unsupported allegations.
Insights
- The judge scrutinized Trump's legal team for lacking substantial evidence and case law to support their serious accusations against the district attorney's office, highlighting the importance of backing up claims with concrete facts in a courtroom setting.
- The delay in the trial was attributed to federal prosecutors, not the Manhattan district attorney, as the judge questioned the rationale behind Trump's legal team's accusations when the Justice Department failed to provide necessary documents, showcasing the judge's strict adherence to legal procedures and skepticism towards unsupported claims.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Why did the judge question Trump's legal team in the courtroom?
The judge questioned Trump's legal team in the courtroom because they accused the district attorney's office of professional misconduct without providing sufficient evidence or case law to support their claim. The judge emphasized the seriousness of such accusations and pressed the legal team for specifics to back up their allegations.
What caused the delay in the trial proceedings?
The delay in the trial proceedings was caused by federal prosecutors taking time to hand over 100,000 documents, not by the Manhattan district attorney's office. This delay was due to the Justice Department's delay in providing the necessary documents, not the fault of the district attorney's office.
How did Trump's legal team respond to the judge's questions about misconduct?
Trump's legal team argued that the district attorney's office should have requested the documents themselves instead of accusing them of misconduct. They failed to provide adequate case law or specifics to support their allegations, leading to the judge's skepticism towards their claims.
What did the judge emphasize regarding accusations in the courtroom?
The judge emphasized the importance of backing up accusations with facts and case law in a courtroom setting. He expressed disappointment in the lack of evidence provided by Trump's legal team to support their serious accusations against the district attorney's office.
How did the judge handle unsupported accusations in the trial?
The judge's handling of the trial indicated a strict adherence to legal procedures and a refusal to tolerate unsupported accusations. He raised his voice for the first time, showing his skepticism towards Trump's legal team's allegations and pressing them for concrete evidence to support their claims.
Related videos
Jimmy Kimmel Live
MANY People Say Trump FARTS in Court and Privately Stews Over Jimmy & Guillermo Meets Madonna!
CNN
'Extraordinary': Hear what happened in court as Trump tried to delay his criminal trial
MSNBC
'He should be worried': Michael Cohen reveals what Trump should fear most in hush money trial
The Daily Show
Jon Stewart, Jordan Klepper & Ronny Chieng Cover Trump's Hush Money Trial | The Daily Show
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert
Can Trump Get A Fair Trial In New York? | Tracking Truth Social’s Share Price | Data-Hungry AI
Summary
00:00
Judge questions Trump team's misconduct accusation.
- The judge in the courtroom has raised his voice for the first time, questioning Trump's legal team's accusation of professional misconduct against the district attorney's office.
- Trump's legal team accused the district attorney's office of prosecutorial misconduct and suggested they should be sanctioned.
- The judge emphasized the seriousness of the accusation and pressed the Trump legal team for case law and specifics to support their claim.
- The delay in the trial is due to federal prosecutors handing over 100,000 documents, not the Manhattan district attorney.
- The judge questioned why the Trump attorneys accused the district attorney's office of misconduct when it was the Justice Department that didn't provide the documents.
- Trump's legal team argued that the district attorney's office should have requested the documents themselves.
- The judge expressed disappointment in the lack of case law to support the serious accusation made by the Trump legal team.
- The judge's skepticism towards Trump's legal team's allegations against the district attorney's office was evident in the courtroom.
- The judge emphasized the importance of backing up accusations with facts and case law in a courtroom setting.
- The judge's handling of the trial indicates a strict adherence to legal procedures and a refusal to tolerate unsupported accusations.
