LoginGet started

МЕСТЬ АРУТА: ОТКРОВЕННЫЕ УГРОЗЫ, ДОНОСЫ И СУДЕБНЫЕ ИСКИ

Министерство Правды・2 minutes read

The narrator discusses serious threats and backlash he has faced following videos about Harutyun Nazaryan, including intimidation tactics against his family, while emphasizing the importance of accountability and resilience in the face of adversity. He critiques the motivations behind a lawsuit initiated by Harutyun's wife and challenges him to confront the issues directly rather than retaliating through legal means.

Insights

  • The narrator highlights the serious repercussions of his content, including threats to his family and potential criminal charges, showcasing the intense backlash he faces for speaking out against Harutyun Nazaryan and the broader issues surrounding him. This underscores the risks involved in challenging powerful figures and the lengths to which they may go to suppress dissent.
  • The speaker critiques the motivations behind legal actions taken against him, suggesting that they are not based on legitimate grievances but rather on a coordinated effort to protect Harutyun's reputation. He points out the absurdity of the lawsuit and questions the integrity of the company behind it, indicating that it may have been created solely to target him, thus revealing the manipulative tactics employed in the conflict.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is a bulletproof vest?

    A bulletproof vest is a type of body armor designed to absorb and reduce the impact from projectiles, such as bullets. These vests are typically made from layers of strong fibers, like Kevlar, which can stop or slow down bullets, preventing them from penetrating the body. They are commonly used by law enforcement, military personnel, and security professionals to protect against gunfire. The effectiveness of a bulletproof vest can vary based on its design, the materials used, and the type of ammunition it is intended to stop. It is important to note that while these vests provide significant protection, they are not completely bulletproof and can only withstand certain levels of threat.

  • How to deal with online threats?

    Dealing with online threats requires a careful and strategic approach to ensure personal safety and security. First, it is crucial to document all threats by taking screenshots and saving any relevant messages or communications. This documentation can be vital if you decide to report the threats to law enforcement or seek legal action. Next, consider adjusting your privacy settings on social media platforms to limit who can view your information and posts. It may also be wise to block or report the individuals making threats. Additionally, if the threats escalate or you feel unsafe, contacting local authorities or a legal professional for guidance is essential. Lastly, maintaining a support network of friends and family can provide emotional support during such distressing situations.

  • What is social media censorship?

    Social media censorship refers to the practice of monitoring, restricting, or removing content on social media platforms based on specific guidelines or policies. This can include the deletion of posts, banning users, or limiting the visibility of certain content deemed inappropriate or harmful. Censorship can be enacted by the platforms themselves, often in response to community standards, legal requirements, or public pressure. Critics argue that social media censorship can infringe on free speech and limit the diversity of opinions shared online. However, proponents believe it is necessary to prevent the spread of misinformation, hate speech, and other harmful content. The balance between protecting users and allowing free expression remains a contentious issue in the digital age.

  • What are the risks of online defamation?

    Online defamation involves making false statements about an individual or organization that can harm their reputation. The risks associated with online defamation are significant, as it can lead to legal consequences, including lawsuits for damages. Victims of defamation may experience emotional distress, loss of income, and damage to their personal and professional relationships. Additionally, the rapid spread of information on the internet can amplify the impact of defamatory statements, making it challenging to control or rectify the situation. It is essential for individuals and businesses to be aware of their online presence and to take proactive measures, such as monitoring their reputation and addressing false claims promptly, to mitigate the risks associated with defamation.

  • How to choose a VPN service?

    Choosing a VPN (Virtual Private Network) service involves several key considerations to ensure you select a reliable and effective option. First, assess the privacy and security features offered by the VPN, such as encryption protocols, a no-logs policy, and protection against DNS leaks. It is also important to evaluate the speed and performance of the VPN, as some services may slow down your internet connection. Additionally, consider the geographical coverage and the number of servers available, as this can affect your ability to access content from different regions. User reviews and ratings can provide insights into the reliability and customer support of the VPN service. Finally, check the pricing and subscription options to find a service that fits your budget while meeting your needs for online privacy and security.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Facing Threats While Exposing Harut's Truth

  • The video begins with a humorous skit involving a 30-meter bulletproof vest, where the narrator humorously recounts being shot three times, resulting in two broken ribs, while noting that 2,500 bulletproof vests were purchased instead of 17,000.
  • The narrator expresses a desire to discuss serious issues rather than humor, indicating that the conversation will focus on egregious events and personal attacks against him, including threats and demands for apologies directed at him.
  • Following the release of videos about Harutyun Nazaryan, the narrator faces significant backlash, including pressure on his parents' employers and potential criminal charges, highlighting the serious consequences of his content.
  • The narrator emphasizes the importance of asking the right questions, stating that the main question of the day is whether people will keep their word, while acknowledging that his video may lead to further denunciations against him.
  • He critiques the societal tendency to value opinions based on wealth, questioning the credibility of a young product delivery person in Kazakhstan who criticizes him as an investor and businessman.
  • The narrator discusses the impact of social media censorship, mentioning that platforms like YouTube and Instagram are slow and that many VPN services have been blocked, recommending "Grandfather VPN" for bypassing these restrictions.
  • Instructions for downloading "Grandfather VPN" are provided, including searching for it in the App Store or following a specific link for Android users, ensuring that all social media and banking services work without interruptions.
  • The narrator reflects on the absurdity of a trademarked persona, Harut, who is afraid of criticism and avoids face-to-face confrontations, while he himself aims to provide valuable insights to young people.
  • He recounts an incident where Harut attempted to retaliate against him, leading to threats and a bounty of $30,000 for information about him, which he dismisses as a sign of desperation.
  • The video concludes with the narrator asserting that despite the threats and attempts to silence him, he will continue to expose the truth about Harut and the broader issues at play, emphasizing the importance of resilience in the face of adversity.

16:31

Unraveling Intimidation and False Accusations

  • The narrative begins with a speaker expressing a lack of grudges, contrasting their perspective with others who harbor resentment, urging the audience to think rationally and avoid unnecessary conflict.
  • Sleigh's parents receive a slanderous appeal from the prosecutor's office, which escalates to their employer, leading to intimidation tactics against them, including threats of job loss under the fifty-ninth Federal Law.
  • The speaker reveals that the complaints against Sleigh originated from a Belarusian company, with a specific individual named Vladimir linked to the case, suggesting that personal information was obtained from the darknet.
  • The speaker discusses the dubious nature of the accusations, indicating that the claims about drug-related activities are fabricated, and that Sleigh merely works in a delivery service transporting cookies.
  • Neighbors report visits from the anti-drug department, and the speaker's mother faces pressure from her employer, who is now involved in the investigation due to the slanderous claims.
  • The speaker mentions a Telegram channel called "Ministry of Truth," where they plan to share uncensored content and updates regarding ongoing threats and legal actions against them.
  • The narrative highlights the escalation of threats against Sleigh, including receiving photographs of his car and veiled warnings about potential legal consequences, indicating a climate of fear and intimidation.
  • The speaker identifies a connection between the threats and a law firm linked to Arut, whose wife is the general director, suggesting a coordinated effort to silence dissent and protect their reputation.
  • The speaker questions the legitimacy of Arut's actions, pointing out inconsistencies in his claims and the involvement of his wife in filing legal complaints against Sleigh for trademark infringement.
  • The narrative concludes with a challenge to Arut, demanding accountability for his actions and questioning the authenticity of his business dealings, while hinting at further revelations that may emerge regarding his past.

32:34

Lawsuit Claims Spark Business Reputation Battle

  • The lawsuit involves a claim against the speaker regarding the use of their name and trademark, initiated by a company linked to Harutyun Nazaryan's wife, which the speaker believes is an attempt to discredit their business reputation.
  • The company, founded in March 2024, has an authorized capital of only 100,000 rubles and claims to engage in educational activities, but the speaker argues it lacks any real economic activity and may have been created solely to file this lawsuit.
  • The lawsuit alleges that the speaker illegally used the company's trademark and received significant amounts of money, which the speaker denies, stating they have not sold any products under that brand.
  • The speaker highlights the absurdity of the lawsuit, noting that mentioning well-known brands like Apple or Mercedes in their content is not illegal, and they believe the claims are unfounded and illogical.
  • The speaker mentions that Harutyun Nazaryan has spent over 150,000 rubles on notary services to document their content and has filed multiple complaints against the speaker, indicating a significant financial investment in these legal actions.
  • The speaker is considering counter-statements but is currently focused on winning the ongoing lawsuits rather than engaging in further legal battles, emphasizing the emotional and financial toll of the situation.
  • The speaker expresses skepticism about Harutyun's motivations, suggesting he is being manipulated into spending money on legal fees and that the situation will only resolve when Harutyun realizes he is being scammed.
  • The speaker invites Harutyun to resolve their issues face-to-face, offering to cover travel expenses for a meeting, and criticizes him for hiding behind his wife's company instead of confronting the situation directly.
  • The speaker concludes by urging Harutyun to delete his social media accounts as promised and emphasizes that any further attempts to mislead law enforcement will be publicly addressed, reinforcing their commitment to transparency in the ongoing legal disputes.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.