i read 5 of the most popular romance books and i no longer believe in love 💔 no spoilers

A Clockwork Reader・2 minutes read

Hannah reviews romance books in detail, critiquing aspects like character development and smut scenes, ultimately giving low ratings to some. She also highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each book, providing recommendations based on individual reading preferences.

Insights

The reviewer found "The Love Hypothesis" lacking in chemistry, character development, and writing quality, ultimately giving it a low rating of two stars due to the disappointing execution of common romance tropes.
"The Spanish Love Deception" is critiqued for its lack of engaging dynamics, questionable writing style, and rushed relationship development, with particular emphasis on the untrustworthy representation of safe sex practices and the male lead's former football player background.
"People We Meet on Vacation" stands out for its well-developed friends-to-lovers relationship, fleshed-out characters with depth, and realistic portrayal of romance, offering a refreshing departure from the shortcomings found in other romance novels.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

What is the narrator's opinion on "The Love Hypothesis"?
Disappointed with writing, chemistry, and character development.
How does the narrator feel about "The Spanish Love Deception"?
Dislikes content, writing style, and character dynamics.
What are the key highlights of "People We Meet on Vacation"?
Features friends-to-lovers romance, well-developed characters, and enjoyable chemistry.
What is the premise of the sapphic romance novel discussed?
Involves time travel, paranormal elements, and a subway meeting.
How do the two books being compared differ in content?
Vary in explicit content, writing quality, and character representation.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

"Hannah Reviews Romance Books: Honest Critiques"

The individual is named Hannah and recently uploaded a video reading five sad books to test their emotional impact.
Viewers suggested she read five happy books, leading to her request for recommendations on Instagram.
Due to the popularity of romance book recommendations, she decided to read five rom-coms.
Hannah warns viewers that she may have negative opinions on popular books and advises them to skip if they prefer not to hear criticism.
The video is spoiler-free, except for minor sections where she discusses a book, with the cover displayed during those moments.
Hannah promotes her reading journal, available at various retailers, for those interested in documenting their reading.
She begins reviewing the romance books, starting with "The Love Hypothesis," a popular book inspired by Reylo fanfiction.
Hannah expresses disappointment with the lack of chemistry and writing quality in "The Love Hypothesis," particularly critiquing the character development and tropes.
She finds the smut scenes in the book to be poorly written and disappointing, comparing them unfavorably to other fanfiction she has read.
Despite some improvement in the second half of the book, Hannah remains unimpressed and expresses frustration with common romance tropes and lackluster storytelling.

11:53

Disappointing Romance Book Lacks Depth

The text discusses the disappointment felt towards a book, "The Love Hypothesis," due to its poor writing and lack of fun.
It mentions the book's structure resembling fan fiction, with broken sentences and periods after each word.
The narrator finishes reading "The Love Hypothesis" and expresses dislike for its light-hearted nature and handling of sexual harassment themes.
The characters in the book are criticized for being bland, lacking personalities, interests, and depth.
The smut scenes in the book are described as dull and cringy, with one scene involving a character revealing they are demisexual during sex.
The rapid development of the romantic relationship in the book is criticized for lacking emotional depth and buildup.
The text highlights the lack of character development and emotional investment in the main characters, making the story feel lifeless.
The narrator expresses a preference for romance books with more yearning and angst, finding "The Love Hypothesis" lacking in these aspects.
The narrator concludes that "The Love Hypothesis" is not their preferred type of romance book, giving it a low rating of two stars.
The text transitions to discussing another book, "The Spanish Love Deception," which is described as a fake dating enemies-to-lovers story that the narrator is curious about.

24:22

"Disappointing Romance Novel Lacks Depth"

The book being discussed is compared to "The Love Hypothesis," with the former having more character development due to its longer length.
The protagonist expresses disappointment in the book's content, particularly disliking lines that make her uncomfortable.
The male lead's background as a former football player is a turn-off for the reviewer.
The book starts with a fake date scenario reminiscent of a TV show episode, leading to criticism of the writing style.
The reviewer finds the book less engaging than "The Love Hypothesis" and struggles with the characters' dynamics.
The male lead's physical description is repeatedly emphasized, with the female lead being portrayed as significantly smaller.
The reviewer questions the book's appeal, suggesting there are better romance novels available.
Criticism is directed at the lack of safe sex practices depicted in the book, including the use of expired condoms.
The reviewer notes similarities between the book and "Twilight," speculating on potential fan fiction origins.
The book's pacing is criticized, with the relationship development feeling rushed towards the end, leading to a lackluster experience for the reviewer.

36:15

"Friends-to-lovers romance with well-developed characters"

The book "Spanish Love Deception" features cringy and corny relationship dynamics, with a former football player giving the protagonist an egg and using the pet name "baby," which is despised.
A charity function date where the protagonist is auctioned off is deemed untrustworthy, and a cringy line during sex scenes is highlighted.
The importance of checking condom expiration dates is emphasized, along with the need to raise standards for smut in literature.
"People We Meet on Vacation" is a friends-to-lovers romance following two characters who travel together frequently, showcasing a well-developed relationship.
The protagonist enjoys the book, appreciating the chemistry between characters and the gradual build-up of their relationship.
The main characters are fleshed out with personalities, interests, and hobbies, adding depth to the story.
The protagonist finds the book enjoyable, with well-written characters and a realistic portrayal of relationships.
The protagonist appreciates the writing style, finding it easy to read with emotional depth and impactful quotes.
The ending of the book is considered rushed, lacking the fleshed-out development seen in the beginning.
The book is noted for being less smutty compared to others, with a focus on well-written romance and character development.

47:24

Sapphic romance with time travel twist

The novel is a sapphic romance centered around a girl named August who moves to New York and meets Jane on a subway.
Unexpectedly, the story involves time travel and a paranormal element, which the narrator was unaware of due to not reading the book's summary.
Initially bored, the narrator found the book slow but became more interested as the plot developed.
The narrator had high expectations due to enjoying a previous romance novel but was unsure if this one would meet those standards.
The inclusion of a paranormal and time-travel component made the story more enjoyable for the narrator.
The romance in the book felt too instant and lacked depth for the narrator's preference, who enjoys more angst in relationships.
The narrator was surprised by the unexpected twist in the story involving Jane's character.
Despite not loving the book, the narrator acknowledges its solid writing and characters but found the romance execution lacking.
The narrator felt disconnected from the characters and their relationship due to Jane's limited development and the lack of depth in their interactions.
Overall, the narrator rates the book a solid three, finding it decent but not exceptional, and suggests it for those seeking a sapphic romance read.

58:11

"Comparing Explicit Romance Novels: Quality Rating"

The two books being compared have different levels of explicit content, with one being smuttier and more explicit than the other, catering to individual preferences in reading material.
The books are praised for their quality of writing, character development, and representation of different body sizes, with the characters being well-fleshed out and entertaining despite falling into the romance genre.
The reviewer rates one of the books as a solid three stars, indicating it's a good read that they would recommend to specific people based on their reading preferences, particularly for those interested in romance novels.

Try it yourself — It’s free.