'He is on record': Weissmann reveals key Trump admission that’s 'on paper'
MSNBC・8 minutes read
Hope Hicks emotionally testified about her former boss's knowledge of the hush money scheme, indicating a rift in their relationship post-January 6th, filling a crucial gap in the trial.
Insights
- Hope Hicks revealed that her former boss was aware of the payoff scheme related to the campaign, providing crucial evidence for the case.
- Hicks testified that her relationship with her former boss had deteriorated, particularly after the January 6th attack, shedding light on the personal dynamics within the organization.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Who is Hope Hicks?
A former associate of a prominent figure.
Related videos
MSNBC
Lawrence: ‘You get monsters like Donald Trump thanks to people like Hope Hicks’
MSNBC
Trump’s defense team fails to rattle Michael Cohen during cross-examination in hush money trial
ABC News
Jury hears secret recording of Trump discussing catch-and-kill payment
MSNBC
Trump 'extremely frightened' about truth coming out: Fmr. White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson
CNN
‘She knew who she married’: Grisham weighs in on Cohen’s testimony about Melania Trump
Summary
00:00
Hope Hicks Testimony Reveals Boss's Knowledge
- Hope Hicks broke down in tears while testifying about her former boss on the stand.
- Her testimony revealed that the payoff was related to the campaign, and her boss knew about the payoff scheme.
- Hicks admitted that she initially believed a false story told to her by her former boss.
- Hicks stated that everyone was just following her former boss's lead.
- Hicks provided direct evidence that her former boss was aware of the hush money scheme involving Stormy Daniels.
- The testimony filled a crucial gap in the case, confirming her former boss's knowledge of the scheme.
- Hicks' emotional testimony indicated a cooling of her relationship with her former boss, especially after the January 6th attack.
- The trial is focusing on the catch and kill operation to protect the candidate from public scrutiny.
