Gamification Sucks... - How to Improve Gamification - Extra Credits
Extra History・1 minute read
Gamification often falls short of providing engaging game-like experiences, relying on basic mechanics. It borrows from video games but needs to balance extrinsic rewards like points with intrinsic rewards for success.
Insights
- The historical roots of gamification can be traced back centuries, with games like Senate in ancient Egypt serving educational purposes, showcasing a long-standing connection between games and learning.
- Effective gamification requires a balance between extrinsic rewards (like points and badges) and intrinsic rewards (such as personal satisfaction), emphasizing the importance of incorporating elements like quest-like assignments and collaborative exam questions to create engaging educational experiences.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What is the purpose of gamification?
To enhance education and training methods.
Related videos
Summary
00:00
"Gamification: Balancing Rewards for Engaging Learning"
- Gamification often fails to deliver on its promise of game-like engagement, offering mundane game mechanics instead.
- The concept of gamification has historical roots, dating back centuries to games like Senate in ancient Egypt designed for educational purposes.
- Gamification borrows video game concepts like badges, XP points, and leaderboards to enhance traditional education and training methods.
- Extrinsic rewards, such as points and badges, are easily trackable and commonly used in gamification, but intrinsic rewards like personal satisfaction are equally important.
- Balancing extrinsic and intrinsic rewards is crucial in effective gamification, as seen in examples like incorporating quest-like assignments, group work dynamics, and collaborative exam questions.
