LoginGet started

Evidence for Ancient High Technology - Part 1: Machining

UnchartedX・38 minutes read

Ancient megalithic structures and artifacts show evidence of advanced technology not attributed to ancient civilizations, challenging mainstream archaeological views. Experts like Flinders Petrie and modern researchers find these achievements remarkable, supporting a reevaluation of human history and origins.

Insights

  • Ancient megalithic structures display machining marks and construction techniques that suggest advanced technology beyond the known capabilities of ancient civilizations, challenging mainstream archaeological views.
  • Evidence of precise machining marks on stone blocks in ancient Egypt, along with the presence of advanced tools like large diameter saws and core drills, indicates a level of technological sophistication not acknowledged by traditional historical narratives, prompting a reevaluation of human history and origins.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What evidence suggests ancient high technology?

    Machining marks on megalithic structures.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Ancient High Technology Challenges Mainstream Archaeology

  • Evidence for ancient high technology includes machining marks and construction techniques in megalithic structures.
  • Objects and artifacts from ancient civilizations display precision and symmetry beyond known capabilities.
  • These out-of-place artifacts suggest advanced technology not attributed to ancient civilizations.
  • Lack of evidence for advanced tools in archaeological records challenges mainstream views.
  • Experts like Flinders Petrie and modern researchers find ancient achievements remarkable.
  • Mainstream archaeology often dismisses evidence of high technology in ancient objects.
  • Precision stonework requires advanced engineering principles not acknowledged by mainstream views.
  • Mainstream archaeologists resist change to maintain established historical narratives.
  • Evidence for ancient high technology contradicts orthodox views on human civilization.
  • The evidence for advanced technology in ancient artifacts supports a reevaluation of human history and origins.

17:10

Debunking Bias: Ancient Technology and Cosmic Impact

  • The bibliography on the Cosmic Tusk website contains links to papers supporting and opposing the impact hypothesis.
  • Professor Hoops criticizes the bibliography as biased and recommends reading only the Wikipedia entry on the Younger Dryas cosmic impact.
  • The Wikipedia entry, authored by Professor Hoops, dismisses the impact theory as pseudoscience, referencing fringe authors like Graham Hancock and Ignatius Donnelly.
  • George Howard's article on the Cosmic Tusk exposes Professor Hoops' attempts to discredit the Younger Dryas cosmic impact theory.
  • Christopher Dunn's research on ancient Egyptian tube drills reveals evidence of advanced technology, including precise machining marks on stone blocks.
  • Tools found in ancient Egypt, like Flint knives and copper chisels, were primitive and incapable of producing the precise machining marks observed on stone blocks.
  • Large diameter saws, estimated to be up to 11 meters in diameter, were likely used to cut through tough materials like granite and basalt in ancient Egypt.
  • Circular saw marks found on stone blocks at sites like Aboo-Seer and Giza suggest the use of advanced mechanized tools not typical of ancient civilizations.
  • Evidence of core drills or tube drills in ancient Egypt and South America indicates the use of advanced tools for cutting through tough materials like granite.
  • Machining marks on ancient Egyptian statues and objects, including over cuts and tube drill holes, suggest the use of powerful industrial processes for shaping and finishing stone.

33:11

Ancient Egyptian Stone Polishing Techniques Revealed

  • A slab at Aboo-Seer displays precise markings, indicating machining and delicate power tool usage.
  • The finishing of stone objects, like boxes and statues, involves multiple stages to achieve a mirror-like polish.
  • Giant black granite boxes in the Serapeum show various stages of finishing, with some not fully polished.
  • Evidence suggests a liquid may have been used in the finishing process, leaving smooth marks on surfaces.
  • The orthodox explanation for ancient Egyptian polishing involves rubbing sand and rocks, but this seems impractical for complex surfaces.
  • Statues in the Egyptian Museum exhibit polished surfaces, highlighting the discrepancy between the technology used for writing and carving.
  • Writing on ancient objects shows rough work compared to the polished surfaces, indicating different levels of technological capabilities.
  • The writing on objects is used for dating purposes, despite disparities in technology levels evident in the craftsmanship.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.