Entrevista a Marc Amoros: Fake News: La verdad de las noticias falsas
informativos・25 minutes read
Colleagues feeling inferior can be alleviated by reading a book on fake news, as denials are ineffective against its impact and fake news spreads virally, appealing to emotions over reason, leading to the decline in fact-checking in journalism. The brain's preference for new information, confirmation bias, and social networks contribute to the widespread sharing of fake news, necessitating educational efforts to discern between true and false information amidst a rise in false information consumption and memory convergence.
Insights
- Fake news is more likely to be shared and spread widely on social networks compared to real news, reaching a large audience and creating false memories due to the brain's preference for new information.
- Responding to fake news with facts or statistics is often ineffective as fake news appeals to emotions, confirming pre-existing beliefs and leading to its widespread sharing within like-minded social circles.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Why is fake news so widely shared?
People are drawn to fake news due to the brain's preference for new information over nuances or denials of known news. Fake news confirms pre-established beliefs, leading to its widespread sharing within like-minded social circles. Additionally, social networks amplify the spread of fake news, reaching more people and creating false memories. The emotional appeal of fake news over reason also contributes to its viral nature.
How does fake news impact memory recall?
The brain is prone to constructing false memories and narratives, making fake news dangerous due to its impact on memory recall. Social networks amplify the spread of fake news, leading to memory convergence and the creation of false memories. Fake news appeals to emotions over reason, creating a loop of belief and sharing, contributing to the decline of fact-checking in journalism.
What is the difference between rumors and fake news?
Rumors are vague and uncertain, while fake news categorically affirms falsehoods, making it more convincing and impactful. Fake news often has economic or ideological objectives, aiming to influence people's thinking. Social networks have revolutionized the spread of fake news, reaching more people and polarizing societies, leading to a rise in false information consumption.
How has social media changed the spread of fake news?
Social networks amplify the spread of fake news, reaching up to 100,000 people and creating false memories. Fake news is shared and tweeted 70% more than real news, highlighting its viral nature. Different individuals have varying codes of values that influence the information they spread on the internet, further contributing to the spread of fake news.
Why is responding to fake news with facts ineffective?
Responding to fake news with facts or cold statistics is ineffective as fake news often appeals to emotions. Fake news appeals to emotions over reason, creating a loop of belief and sharing, contributing to the post-truth era and the decline of fact-checking in journalism. Politicians, including Trump, may spread biased or false information to manipulate public opinion, further complicating the effectiveness of factual responses.
Related videos
TED
How we can protect truth in the age of misinformation | Sinan Aral
TEDx Talks
You're being manipulated and don't even know it | Nate Pressner | TEDxYouth@Basel
Hej hej Sverige
Vad är källkritik? Och hur är man källkritisk? | KORTFATTAT
After Skool
MASS PSYCHOSIS - How an Entire Population Becomes MENTALLY ILL
BBC Learning English
Fake News: Fact & Fiction - Episode 3: Information or disinformation?
Summary
00:00
"Fake News Impact: Belief, Spread, and Memory"
- Interviewing colleagues can be uncomfortable due to feeling inferior, but a book on fake news is recommended for dispelling doubts.
- Fake news can garner hundreds of likes, while denials receive zero likes, proving the ineffectiveness of denials against fake news impact.
- Fake news is shared and tweeted 70% more than real news, reaching up to 100,000 people, highlighting its viral nature.
- People are drawn to fake news due to the brain's preference for new information over nuances or denials of known news.
- Fake news confirms pre-established beliefs, leading to its widespread sharing within like-minded social circles.
- Social networks amplify the spread of fake news, leading to memory convergence and the creation of false memories.
- The brain is prone to constructing false memories and narratives, making fake news dangerous due to its impact on memory recall.
- Rumors are vague and uncertain, while fake news categorically affirms falsehoods, making it more convincing and impactful.
- Social networks have revolutionized the spread of fake news, reaching more people and polarizing societies, leading to a rise in false information consumption.
- Fake news appeals to emotions over reason, creating a loop of belief and sharing, contributing to the post-truth era and the decline of fact-checking in journalism.
17:44
"Fake News: Impact, Spread, and Solutions"
- Different individuals have varying codes of values that influence the information they spread on the internet.
- The media has been criticized for not self-criticizing, contrasting, or denying false news effectively.
- Responding to fake news with facts or cold statistics is ineffective as fake news often appeals to emotions.
- Trump has popularized the term "fake news" and increased its usage by 365%.
- Politicians, including Trump, may spread biased or false information to manipulate public opinion.
- Fake news often has economic or ideological objectives, aiming to influence people's thinking.
- A national and international debate on fake news is deemed necessary due to its widespread impact.
- Educational efforts are crucial to help consumers discern between true and false information.
- Turning the fight against fake news into a weapon to attack opponents is deemed dangerous and counterproductive.
