Disney Remakes Need to Die (and Peter Pan and Wendy is Unwatchable Trash)

Despot of Antrim・2 minutes read

Disney's live-action remakes are financially successful but criticized for lacking artistic depth and originality, with "Peter Pan and Wendy" receiving negative feedback for poor acting and dark settings. The author condemns Disney for prioritizing profit over cultural influence, highlighting issues like plagiarism and token race swaps in their films.

Insights

  • The Disney live-action remakes, including "Peter Pan and Wendy," are financially successful despite facing criticism for deviating from beloved classics and lacking artistic depth, focusing more on outward appearances than thematic richness.
  • Disney's approach to remakes, as seen in "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," prioritizes replicating visual elements over deeper thematic layers, resulting in hollow cinematic experiences criticized for plagiarism, lack of emotional connection, and a missed opportunity for positive cultural influence.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • Are Disney live-action remakes financially successful?

    Yes, Disney live-action remakes are financially successful.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Disney's Peter Pan and Wendy: A Critique

  • Disney Live Action remakes are financially successful despite being criticized for ruining beloved classics.
  • The most recent Disney live-action remake discussed is "Peter Pan and Wendy," referred to as lar17.
  • The reviewer watched only the first 20 minutes of lar17 and found it boring and beneath critical consideration.
  • The performance of the child actor playing Peter Pan in lar17 is heavily criticized for lacking energy and charisma.
  • The Lost Boys in lar17 are also criticized for their poor acting, resembling elementary school play performances.
  • The wire work in lar17, especially during flying scenes, is deemed garishly awful and unconvincing.
  • Wendy in lar17 is portrayed as a typical guard boss character, following a predictable arc of empowerment and adventure.
  • The portrayal of Tiger Lily in lar17 is criticized for being a stereotypical and culturally condescending depiction of Native Americans.
  • The setting of lar17, including the Darling family home and Neverland, is described as dark, grim, and lacking magic.
  • Disney's live-action remakes, including lar17, are condemned for lacking artistic depth and significance compared to original works like "Pinocchio."

15:57

Disney Remakes Lack Originality and Artistic Integrity

  • Pinocchio, whether a real boy or not, is considered real because he feels like one, emphasizing the power of self-belief.
  • The Disney live-action remakes, like Pinocchio, aim to appear as real versions of the original movies they imitate, focusing on outward appearances.
  • Disney's approach to remakes, like "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," relies heavily on replicating the visual elements associated with the original, neglecting deeper thematic and symbolic layers.
  • The screen wipes in Disney's Star Wars remakes lack the symbolic and thematic depth present in the original movies, serving merely as visual imitations.
  • Disney's political themes in their remakes are overt and specific to the current era, contrasting with the sub-textual and thematic politics of the original works.
  • The Disney remakes are criticized for lacking emotional connection and originality, resulting in a hollow cinematic experience.
  • Disney's remakes are accused of plagiarism, with the original works being credited to previous generations of artists rather than the current Disney corporation.
  • The live-action remakes are condemned for being carbon copies of the original works, lacking innovation and artistic integrity.
  • The vast financial resources spent on Disney's remakes are seen as wasteful, with suggestions for better uses like funding independent projects or original content.
  • Disney's remakes are viewed as a missed opportunity to influence culture positively, with a focus on profit over artistic growth and innovation, leading to a decline in quality and talent utilization.

32:04

Disney's Race Swaps and Cultural Critiques

  • Disney's race swaps in movies are criticized for being cringeworthy and tokenizing, with examples likened to embarrassing scenarios at a wedding or a rock band past its prime.
  • The author argues that Disney's movies, already considered terrible due to being plagiarized, are irrelevant and fail even before release, with race swaps not affecting the overall quality.
  • Disney's collaboration with Chinese authorities during the filming of Mulan is highlighted, emphasizing the company's prioritization of socio-political and ideological goals over marginalized communities.
  • The text criticizes Disney's live-action remakes, labeling them as a cultural nihilism statement, indicating a lack of originality and innovation in modern entertainment.
  • The author laments the current state of culture, claiming that the entertainment industry is now dominated by profit-driven agendas, with originality being overshadowed by regurgitation and propaganda.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.