LoginGet started

Dismantling Child Welfare: The Way Forward?

National Press Foundation・61 minutes read

The Future of the American Child journalism training underscores the systemic flaws in the child welfare system, particularly its racial biases and harmful practices that disproportionately affect Black and marginalized families. Alan Dettlaff advocates for an abolitionist approach to replace punitive measures with community support, emphasizing the need to address root causes like poverty rather than relying on government intervention that often exacerbates trauma.

Insights

  • Discussions surrounding child welfare typically emerge only in response to crises like neglect or abuse, which limits public understanding of the systemic failures that persist in the child welfare system and are often overlooked in mainstream media.
  • Alan Dettlaff, a key advocate for reforming the child welfare system, characterizes it as a "family policing system" that focuses more on surveillance and punishment than on providing real support to families, drawing attention to the trauma inflicted on children who are removed from their homes, often due to circumstances linked to poverty rather than actual harm.
  • Racial disproportionality is a significant issue within the child welfare system, with Black children making up a disproportionately high percentage of those in foster care, despite not experiencing higher rates of maltreatment compared to their White and Latinx peers; systemic biases and poverty are major contributing factors.
  • The abolition movement argues that reforms to the child welfare system are inadequate and advocates for a complete overhaul, emphasizing the need for community-based support systems and the reallocation of funds to address the root causes of family struggles, such as poverty and lack of resources, rather than relying on punitive measures that exacerbate trauma.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • What is child welfare system?

    A child welfare system is a government framework designed to protect children from abuse and neglect, ensuring their safety and well-being. It involves various services and interventions aimed at supporting families and, when necessary, removing children from harmful situations. The system typically includes child protective services (CPS), foster care, and adoption services. However, it has faced criticism for its approach, particularly regarding racial disparities and the trauma inflicted on children through family separation. Advocates argue for a re-evaluation of the system to focus more on community support and prevention rather than punitive measures.

  • How can I support struggling families?

    Supporting struggling families can be achieved through various means, including providing direct assistance, volunteering with local organizations, and advocating for policy changes that address systemic issues. Community resources such as food banks, childcare services, and housing assistance programs are vital in helping families meet their basic needs. Additionally, fostering a supportive environment where families can access services without fear of punitive actions is crucial. Engaging in community initiatives that promote economic stability and social support can also empower families, helping them navigate challenges collaboratively and reducing reliance on government intervention.

  • What are the effects of family separation?

    Family separation can have profound and lasting effects on children, leading to emotional, psychological, and physical health issues. Research indicates that children who are removed from their families often experience trauma comparable to that seen in cases of severe abuse. This trauma can manifest as cognitive delays, increased aggression, and poor educational outcomes. Additionally, children in foster care face higher rates of mental health problems, delinquency, and incarceration compared to those who remain with their families. The long-term consequences of separation highlight the need for supportive interventions that prioritize family unity and address the root causes of issues like poverty.

  • What is racial disproportionality in child welfare?

    Racial disproportionality in child welfare refers to the overrepresentation of certain racial and ethnic groups, particularly Black and Indigenous children, within the child welfare system compared to their population size. This phenomenon indicates systemic biases that lead to higher rates of reporting, removal, and maltreatment confirmations for these groups. Factors contributing to this disproportionality include poverty, racial bias among reporters and caseworkers, and historical practices rooted in racism. Addressing these disparities requires a comprehensive approach that includes policy reform, community support, and a shift in how society perceives and addresses family welfare.

  • What is the abolition movement in child welfare?

    The abolition movement in child welfare advocates for the complete dismantling of the current child welfare system, which is viewed as inherently harmful and ineffective. Proponents argue that reforms have failed to address the fundamental issues of family separation and systemic racism within the system. The movement emphasizes the need to replace punitive measures with community-based support systems that address the root causes of family struggles, such as poverty and lack of resources. By reallocating funds from the child welfare system to provide direct assistance to families, the movement seeks to create a more equitable framework that prioritizes family unity and community care over state intervention.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Reforming the Child Welfare System in America

  • The second day of the Future of the American Child journalism training, sponsored by the National Press Foundation, is taking place in McAllen, Texas, focusing on child well-being and future prospects for American children, with gratitude expressed to sponsors like the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, WK Kellogg Foundation, and Heising-Simons Foundation.
  • Discussions on child welfare often arise only during tragedies, such as child neglect or abuse cases, leading to a narrow understanding of the system's failures, which are rarely addressed in public discourse or mainstream media.
  • Alan Dettlaff, a prominent figure in the movement to reform the child welfare system, is introduced as a speaker; he recently stepped down as Dean of the University of Houston's Graduate College of Social Work due to his outspoken views on the system's challenges, particularly regarding racial disparities.
  • Dettlaff describes the child welfare system as a "family policing system," emphasizing its role in surveilling, regulating, and punishing families rather than genuinely supporting them, and highlights his experience as a caseworker who removed over 100 children from their families.
  • Over 250,000 children are forcibly separated from their families each year in the U.S., with a significant number of removals occurring due to neglect, often linked to poverty rather than actual harm, as 70% of children in foster care are there for neglect-related reasons.
  • Dettlaff notes that the trauma experienced by children removed from their families by the child welfare system is comparable to the outrage seen during the Trump administration's Zero Tolerance policy, which involved the removal of approximately 3,000 children at the U.S.-Mexico border.
  • Rates of physical and sexual abuse in foster care are reported to be two to three times higher than in the general population, with specific issues in Texas, where children in group homes have been trafficked, highlighting the dangers of the foster care system.
  • Parents often receive no meaningful support or services related to their actual needs, such as daycare or housing assistance, which leads to unnecessary separations; for example, a mother was reported to Child Protective Services for leaving her child at home while working, resulting in the child's removal.
  • Racial disproportionality in the child welfare system has persisted since its inception, with Black children being overrepresented in the system compared to their population size, indicating systemic issues that have not improved despite decades of reform efforts.
  • Dettlaff aims to clarify misconceptions about the child welfare system, including its perceived benevolence and necessity, and advocates for an abolitionist approach to create a more equitable and supportive framework for families, particularly those affected by racial disparities.

15:01

Racial Disproportionality in Foster Care System

  • Black children represent approximately 25% of the foster care population, despite being only 12-15% of the general child population, indicating significant racial disproportionality in the system.
  • Racial disproportionality also affects Latinx and Indigenous children, with Latinx children overrepresented in about 15 states and Indigenous children showing varying rates of overrepresentation depending on state demographics.
  • Black children are more likely to be reported to child protective services (CPS) by teachers and medical providers, with studies showing that similar cases involving Black children are more likely to lead to CPS referrals compared to White children.
  • Once in the system, Black children are more likely to be confirmed for maltreatment, removed from their homes, and have their parental rights terminated, leading to longer stays in foster care and a higher likelihood of aging out of the system without reunification.
  • Research indicates that there is no evidence suggesting that Black children experience higher rates of maltreatment than their White or Latinx counterparts; rather, systemic issues such as poverty and racial bias contribute to their overrepresentation in foster care.
  • Factors contributing to racial disproportionality include poverty, racial bias among hotline reporters and staff, a young and untrained workforce in child welfare, and geographic contexts with concentrated poverty.
  • Historical context reveals that the child welfare system has roots in systemic racism, with practices dating back to slavery that intentionally separated Black families and excluded them from support systems designed for White families.
  • Legislative actions, such as the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) of 1974, were known to disproportionately harm Black children, yet were passed regardless, leading to systemic biases in child welfare outcomes.
  • Data analysis shows that Black children are 15% more likely than White children to be confirmed for maltreatment, and 77% more likely to enter foster care instead of receiving in-home services, even when controlling for poverty and risk factors.
  • The CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) program, which is predominantly staffed by White middle-class women, has been shown to contribute to the overrepresentation of Black children in the system, highlighting the impact of biases in decision-making processes within child welfare.

29:45

Abolishing Family Policing for Community Empowerment

  • The family policing system disproportionately affects Black families, with Black children facing removal at lower risk levels compared to white families, highlighting systemic racism as an active force rather than a passive occurrence.
  • Family separation, regardless of duration (from two weeks to two years), inflicts lifelong trauma on children, leading to cognitive delays, increased aggression, poor educational outcomes, and significant physical health issues such as obesity and hypertension.
  • Research indicates that children in foster care experience worse outcomes than those who remain at home after similar maltreatment, including higher delinquency rates, lower earnings, and increased likelihood of mental health problems and incarceration.
  • The child welfare system exacerbates existing societal issues like poverty and homelessness, particularly for Black children, who are already at a higher risk of these outcomes due to systemic racism.
  • The abolition movement, which began discussions in 2018-2019, argues that reforms to the child welfare system are insufficient, as they fail to address the fundamental harm caused by family separation.
  • The movement emphasizes that the child welfare system, which has been reform-proof for decades, cannot evolve into a system that achieves equity, necessitating a complete abolition of the system.
  • Abolition is framed as a dual process: ending harmful practices like involuntary family separation while simultaneously building community-based support systems that address root causes of issues like poverty and unemployment.
  • The proposal includes reallocating funds from the child welfare system (approximately $30 billion annually) to provide direct financial assistance to struggling families, which could reduce the need for foster care and address maltreatment rates.
  • Abolition advocates for a societal shift towards community care, emphasizing that safety and support should come from high-quality public services rather than state intervention, which often inflicts further harm.
  • The abolition process is described as a long-term effort to empower communities and families, moving away from government control and fostering a supportive environment where families can address their challenges collaboratively.

45:18

Community Support and Racial Disparities in Child Welfare

  • Community resources are essential for mothers who may lack family support, allowing them to access necessary services without fear of punitive actions, such as hotline calls, fostering a supportive environment for all families, particularly those in marginalized communities.
  • Historical context reveals that during the Orphan Train movement, Black children were systematically excluded from services, prompting Black families to establish their own organizations and resources, emphasizing the importance of community trust and self-sufficiency.
  • The conversation around child welfare reform includes the need for oversight, but there is uncertainty about the necessity of surveillance, with a goal of reducing it as community care systems are developed, acknowledging that this is a long-term process.
  • More than 70% of children currently not in the child welfare system are not there due to safety concerns, indicating a need for a shift in how society perceives and addresses family welfare without relying on government surveillance.
  • The federal rules prevent schools involved in shootings from improving their facilities, highlighting systemic issues in funding and support for mental health resources, which parallels the challenges faced in child welfare reform discussions.
  • The privatization of Texas's foster care system is criticized as a deceptive practice, where community organizations are tasked with policing roles rather than providing genuine community-based care, undermining the intended support for families.
  • Racial biases within child protective services (CPS) lead to discriminatory practices, where caseworkers often pre-judge families based on neighborhood demographics, resulting in harmful decisions that disproportionately affect Black families.
  • There is currently no organized labor movement among Texas state employees in child protective services, which limits collective action against systemic issues, unlike the more established opposition seen in police unions.
  • Effective storytelling is crucial for changing public perception about child welfare, focusing on the harms of family separation and the fact that many children are removed from their homes due to poverty rather than abuse, which is often misunderstood.
  • Highlighting racial disparities in child welfare, such as Black children being 3.5 times more likely to be separated from their families than white children for similar reasons, is essential for raising awareness and advocating for resource reallocation towards community support rather than punitive measures.

59:56

Rethinking Child Welfare and Family Support

  • Concerns about the misuse of financial assistance for drugs often arise when discussing support for low-income parents, particularly among marginalized groups, highlighting a societal bias against poor mothers, especially Black mothers, despite evidence that 70% of children in foster care have not been harmed by their parents.
  • The National Council for Juvenile and Family Court Judges provides a resource called the disproportionality dashboard, which can be accessed by searching "ncj fcj disproportionality" to explore the overrepresentation of Indigenous children in the child welfare system across various states, noting that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) offers some protections that may be at risk of being overturned.
  • Immigration-related issues significantly contribute to the disproportionality of Latinx children in the foster care system, as some states do not allow undocumented relatives to serve as kinship caregivers, leading to children being placed in foster care instead of with willing family members, often exacerbated by cultural misunderstandings and language barriers.
  • Proposed interim steps to reduce harm in the child welfare system include changing definitions of neglect to specify "intentional failure" to provide basic needs, repealing mandatory reporting laws in favor of "mandatory supporting" laws that encourage professionals to connect families with resources rather than report them to Child Protective Services (CPS), and repealing the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) to prevent expedited terminations of parental rights.
  • The UpEnd Movement advocates for a shift in child welfare narratives and policies, encouraging journalists to engage with their resources, including a policy report available at upendmovement.org, which outlines strategies for achieving abolition in child welfare, and highlights the importance of discussions linking the prison abolition movement with child welfare reform.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.