Die Nürnberger Prozesse (3/3): Das Dritte Reich vor Gericht | SPIEGEL TV
DER SPIEGEL・21 minutes read
Key Nazi leaders were tried at Nuremberg for their roles in World War II, with Göring, Ribbentrop, Keitel, and others defending themselves against charges of war crimes. The Nuremberg trials aimed to establish accountability for atrocities committed during the war and set a precedent for international law against aggression and crimes against humanity.
Insights
- The Nuremberg trials involved high-ranking Nazi officials like Hermann Göring and Albert Speer defending their actions during World War II, with a focus on individual responsibility for war crimes, including the Holocaust.
- The Nuremberg judgments established a precedent by declaring wars as crimes in international law, aiming to hold individuals accountable for their actions during wartime and prevent future dictatorships from evading responsibility by hiding behind sovereign states.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What were the outcomes of the Nuremberg trial?
The Nuremberg trial resulted in the sentencing of defendants to death, life imprisonment, or time sentences, with some being acquitted. The International Military Tribunal handed down these judgments, marking wars as crimes in international law. The trial aimed to prevent dictatorships from using sovereign states as a shield in the future, establishing a precedent for holding individuals accountable for war crimes and atrocities committed during conflicts.
Who were some of the key figures involved in the Nuremberg trial?
The Nuremberg trial involved prominent figures such as Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, Major General Marx, Hermann Göring, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Julius Streicher, Karl Dönitz, and Albert Speer. These individuals played various roles in the Nazi regime and were either defendants or witnesses in the trial, where they faced accusations related to war crimes, atrocities, and their involvement in the Holocaust.
What were the defense strategies employed by the defendants in the Nuremberg trial?
The defendants in the Nuremberg trial employed different defense strategies to justify their actions. Defense lawyers debated whether to treat the trial as a criminal or political case, while individuals like Hermann Göring emphasized their efforts to strengthen National Socialist power. Some, like Joachim von Ribbentrop and Wilhelm Keitel, claimed innocence by stating loyalty to Hitler and duty to follow orders, respectively. Others, such as Ernst Kaltenbrunner and Julius Streicher, denied involvement in war crimes despite evidence presented against them.
How did Albert Speer's actions during the Nuremberg trial differ from other defendants?
Albert Speer's actions during the Nuremberg trial set him apart from other defendants. He broke through the united front of others by admitting to militarization and slave labor, expressing a desire to sabotage Hitler's scorched earth order. Speer also confessed to exaggerating his resistance plans, defending Hitler's policies, and denying knowledge of extermination plans and camps. His public remorse and willingness to take responsibility for his actions contrasted with the denial and justifications of other defendants.
What was the significance of the Nuremberg judgments in international law?
The Nuremberg judgments held significant implications for international law by declaring wars as crimes. This legal precedent aimed to prevent dictatorships from hiding behind sovereign states in the future, establishing accountability for individuals involved in war crimes and atrocities. The judgments set a standard for prosecuting individuals responsible for crimes against humanity, genocide, and other violations of international law, shaping the development of international criminal law and human rights frameworks.
Related videos
DER SPIEGEL
Die Nürnberger Prozesse (1/3): Das Dritte Reich vor Gericht | SPIEGEL TV
Best Documentary
Göring's Secret: The Story of Hitler's Marshall
imineo Documentaires
Hitler, les secrets de l'ascension d'un monstre
The People Profiles
Heinrich Himmler - Reichsführer-SS Documentary
The Infographics Show
50 Insane Facts About the Nazis
Summary
00:00
"Nuremberg Trial: German Leaders Defend Actions"
- Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus, commander-in-chief of the Sixth Army, testifies in the Nuremberg trial about German attack plans against the Soviet Union.
- Major General Marx initiated an operational draft for an attack on the Soviet Union, continued by Paulus under the High Command of the Army.
- Defense lawyers strategize for their clients, debating between treating the trial as a criminal or political case.
- Hermann Göring, once arrogant, justifies his actions in court, emphasizing his efforts to strengthen the National Socialist power.
- Göring's defense is dismantled by prosecutor Robert Jackson, focusing on his involvement in the Holocaust.
- Joachim von Ribbentrop, Hitler's foreign minister, claims innocence by stating his unwavering loyalty to Hitler.
- Wilhelm Keitel, a high-ranking Wehrmacht officer, defends himself by asserting his duty to follow orders.
- Ernst Kaltenbrunner denies involvement in war crimes, including executions at concentration camps, despite evidence presented.
- Julius Streicher, editor of an anti-Semitic newspaper, denies responsibility for inciting violence against Jews.
- Karl Dönitz, former commander of the submarine armada, refutes accusations of ordering the shooting of shipwrecked enemies.
23:01
Nuremberg Trials: Justice for Nazi Leaders
- Hitler ordered the removal of 31.5 million workers from occupied territories, instructing military commanders to comply with Saugel's demands.
- Speer exaggerated his resistance plans, defended Hitler's scorched earth policy, and denied knowledge of extermination plans and camps.
- Speer confessed to militarization and slave labor, expressing a desire to sabotage Hitler's scorched earth order.
- The defendants faced trial at Nuremberg, with Albert Speer breaking through the united front of others and showing public remorse.
- The International Military Tribunal sentenced defendants to death, life imprisonment, or time sentences, with some acquitted.
- Hermann Göring requested to be shot before his execution, which was carried out for the convicted Nazi leaders.
- The Nuremberg judgments declared wars as crimes in international law, aiming to prevent dictatorships from hiding behind sovereign states in the future.
