cha CLJ3 part8a
Cha Agrito・2 minutes read
An accused person is defined as one currently in court proceedings, possessing specific rights under the 1987 Constitution that ensure due process, including the right to a fair trial and to be informed of accusations. Bail eligibility varies based on the nature of the offense and the strength of evidence, with specific rules outlining when it can be applied for, emphasizing the balance between an accused's rights and public safety.
Insights
- An accused person is someone whose legal case is actively being tried in court, which is a crucial distinction from a suspect who is still under investigation; this status grants the accused specific rights as outlined in the 1987 Constitution, including the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial, ensuring they are treated justly throughout legal proceedings.
- Due process is fundamental in both criminal and civil cases, requiring that individuals are informed of charges against them and given a fair chance to defend themselves; this principle extends to various contexts, such as employee terminations and student disciplinary actions, highlighting the necessity for clear communication and opportunity for defense to uphold justice and prevent arbitrary decisions.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
What is the definition of due process?
Due process is a legal principle that ensures fair treatment through the judicial system. It guarantees that individuals are given notice of legal proceedings against them and an opportunity to be heard before any judgment is made. This principle is enshrined in many legal systems, including the U.S. Constitution, which mandates that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Due process encompasses both procedural and substantive rights, ensuring that laws are applied fairly and that individuals have the right to defend themselves against accusations. It is a fundamental safeguard against arbitrary governance and is essential for maintaining justice and protecting individual rights.
How does bail work in criminal cases?
Bail is a legal mechanism that allows an accused person to be released from custody while awaiting trial, typically in exchange for a monetary guarantee that they will appear in court. The right to apply for bail can depend on the nature of the crime and the strength of the evidence against the accused. For serious offenses, such as those punishable by death or life imprisonment, the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right before a conviction, provided the evidence of guilt is not strong. After a conviction, the ability to secure bail becomes discretionary, meaning the court decides whether to grant it based on various factors, including the severity of the crime and the accused's history. Bail serves to balance the presumption of innocence with the need to ensure that the accused appears for their court proceedings.
What rights do the accused have in court?
The accused have several fundamental rights in court, designed to ensure a fair trial and protect their interests. These rights include the presumption of innocence, meaning they are considered innocent until proven guilty. They also have the right to be informed of the charges against them, to have legal counsel, and to present a defense. The accused are entitled to a speedy and public trial, the opportunity to confront witnesses, and the right to secure their own witnesses and evidence. Additionally, they cannot be tried for the same offense twice (double jeopardy) and have the right to bail in certain circumstances. These rights are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process and ensuring that justice is served.
What is the role of jurisdiction in legal cases?
Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide a case. It is a critical aspect of the legal system, as it determines which court has the power to adjudicate a particular matter. Jurisdiction can be established over the person of the accused through voluntary surrender or valid arrest, while subject matter jurisdiction depends on the nature of the crime. For instance, crimes punishable by six years or less typically fall under first-level courts, whereas more serious offenses are handled by regional trial courts. Additionally, jurisdiction is limited to the geographical area where the crime occurred, meaning a court in one location cannot hear a case involving a crime committed in another area. Understanding jurisdiction is essential for ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted in the appropriate forum.
What happens if due process is violated?
If due process is violated, it can lead to significant legal consequences, including the dismissal of charges or the overturning of convictions. Due process violations occur when an individual is not afforded their legal rights during legal proceedings, such as not being given proper notice of charges, not having the opportunity to defend themselves, or being subjected to arbitrary judgment. In criminal cases, failure to adhere to due process can result in a mistrial or an appeal, as the integrity of the judicial process is compromised. In civil and administrative contexts, due process violations can also lead to legal challenges against decisions made by employers or institutions. Upholding due process is essential for maintaining public trust in the legal system and ensuring that justice is served fairly and equitably.
Related videos
Daniel Coronell
Reacciono al vídeo "Llamamiento a juicio" de Álvaro Uribe | Daniel Coronell
CNN
Judge raises his voice while questioning Trump's attorneys
PsychotherapyNet
Legal and Ethical Issues for Mental Health Professionals: Volume I
Studicata
Criminal Law: The Actus Reus Requirement [LEAP Preview]
BuzzFeed Multiplayer
Real Lawyer Goes To Court in Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney • Professionals Play
Summary
00:00
Rights and Processes for the Accused Explained
- An accused is defined as a person whose case is pending in court, meaning their case has been filed and is undergoing trial, distinguishing them from a suspect who is still under investigation by law enforcement.
- The 1987 Constitution outlines nine specific rights of the accused, including: the right to due process, the presumption of innocence, the right to be heard with counsel, the right to be informed of the accusations, the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to confront witnesses, the right to secure witnesses and evidence, the right against double jeopardy, and the right to bail.
- Due process, as stated in Section 14 of the Constitution, ensures that no person shall be held for a criminal offense without due process of law, emphasizing that the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
- The requisites for criminal due process include: (1) the accused must be heard by a court of competent jurisdiction, which requires jurisdiction over the person, subject matter, and territory; (2) the accused must be proceeded against under the orderly process of law as outlined in the Rules of Criminal Procedure; (3) the accused must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard; and (4) judgment must be rendered after a lawful hearing.
- Jurisdiction over the person of the accused can be established through voluntary surrender or valid arrest, while jurisdiction over the subject matter depends on the nature of the crime, with crimes punishable by six years or less falling under first-level courts, and those punishable by more than six years falling under regional trial courts.
- The crime must occur within the territory where the court exercises jurisdiction; for example, if a crime occurs in Baguio, the courts in Palawan would not have jurisdiction over that case.
- The orderly process of law requires that the accused is processed according to established legal procedures, which are detailed in the Rules of Criminal Procedure, ensuring that the accused is not subjected to arbitrary judgment.
- The accused must be notified of the charges against them and given the opportunity to defend themselves, as they cannot adequately defend against accusations they are unaware of.
- A judgment can only be rendered after a lawful hearing, which includes the presentation of evidence and a fair trial process, ensuring that the accused's rights are respected throughout the legal proceedings.
- The principles of criminal due process are applicable not only in criminal cases but also in civil cases, although administrative cases may follow different procedures.
28:31
Due Process in Employee and Student Terminations
- Employers must observe procedural due process when terminating an employee, which includes providing two specific notices: a notice of intent to dismiss and a notice of dismissal.
- The first notice, the notice of intent to dismiss, must specify the grounds for termination and provide the employee with a reasonable opportunity to explain their side, ensuring they are informed of the reasons behind the dismissal.
- The employee must be given a reasonable timeframe to respond to the notice of intent to dismiss, allowing them to defend themselves against the charges presented.
- A hearing or conference must be conducted where the employee can respond to the charges and present evidence in their defense, ensuring that their side of the story is heard.
- If, after the hearing, the employer finds sufficient grounds for termination, a second notice, the notice of dismissal, must be issued, indicating that the decision was made after careful consideration of all circumstances.
- In cases of disciplinary actions against students, schools must inform students in writing of the nature and cause of any accusations, similar to the notice required in employee terminations.
- Students have the right to answer the charges against them, and they may seek assistance from counsel if desired, ensuring they have support during the process.
- Schools must provide students with the evidence against them, allowing students to understand the basis of the accusations and prepare their defense.
- Students must also be given the opportunity to present their own evidence to rebut the claims made against them, which must be considered by the investigating committee or designated officials.
- Failure to follow these due process requirements in disciplinary actions, such as not providing written notice or the opportunity to be heard, can lead to violations of due process, as established by legal precedents.
01:05:38
Bail Rights and Limitations in Criminal Cases
- Before a judgment of conviction by the Regional Trial Court (RTC), a defendant can apply for bail as a matter of right if the offense is punishable by death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment, provided that the evidence of guilt is not strong against the accused.
- For crimes such as parricide, which carries a penalty of reclusion perpetua (20 years and 1 day to 40 years imprisonment), bail can be applied for as a matter of right before a judgment of conviction if the evidence of guilt is weak.
- If the RTC has not yet convicted the accused and the crime is punishable by death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment, the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right, regardless of the strength of the evidence against them.
- After a judgment of conviction by the RTC, if the imposed penalty is less than death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment, bail becomes a matter of discretion, meaning it is up to the court to decide whether to grant it.
- If the crime committed is parricide and the evidence of guilt is not strong, the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right before conviction; however, after conviction, the ability to apply for bail depends on the court's discretion.
- Once a judgment of conviction becomes final and executory, the accused has 15 days to appeal; after this period, they are required to serve their sentence and cannot apply for bail.
- Certain circumstances disqualify an accused from availing of bail, including being a recidivist, having previously escaped from legal confinement, or committing an offense while on probation or parole.
- The rationale for granting bail is to ensure the accused's appearance in court and to prevent the commission of additional crimes, emphasizing the importance of maintaining public safety and the integrity of the judicial process.
