Casio fx-CG50 vs TI-84 Plus CE Review and Comparison
Math Class Calculator・2 minutes read
The TI 84 Plus CE and Casio FX CG50 are similar graphing calculators with differences in power sources, battery life, and design features, offering various functions like derivatives and integrals along with graphing capabilities in different coordinate systems and 3D graphs. Casio FX CG50 is a more affordable option with similar capabilities but less popularity compared to TI 84 Plus CE.
Insights
- Casio FX CG50 offers longer-lasting AAA batteries but is thicker compared to the slimmer TI 84 Plus CE with a rechargeable lithium-ion battery.
- Casio FX CG50 provides exact answers for radicals and fractions, while TI 84 Plus CE lacks this feature but offers a more straightforward menu layout for functions like derivatives and integrals.
Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free
Recent questions
Which calculator has a slimmer design?
TI 84 Plus CE
What type of batteries does the Casio FX CG50 use?
Four AAA batteries
Which calculator offers exact answers for radicals and fractions?
Casio FX CG50
Which calculator is faster in internal calculations?
Casio FX CG50
Which calculator offers a 3D graphing feature?
Casio FX CG50
Related videos
Equaser
Getting started with Casio FX-300MS Scientific Calculator
Equaser
Getting Started with CASIO FX-991EX FX-570EX CLASSSWIZ Full Manual learn all features
Equaser
Casio FX-991ES Plus and FX-115ES Plus 2nd Edition, Learn All Features
Equaser
The difference between Casio FX-991EX and Casio FX-991CW
Equaser
CASIO fx-991CW fx-570CW CLASSWIZ Calculator Full Example Manual
Summary
00:00
TI 84 Plus CE vs Casio FX CG50
- Comparison between TI 84 Plus CE and Casio FX CG50.
- Similar size and shape, both with similar button layouts.
- TI 84 Plus CE is slimmer due to a built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while Casio uses four AAA batteries, making it thicker.
- Casio's AAA batteries last longer but require replacements, while rechargeable AAA batteries can be used with Casio.
- Both have high-resolution color screens, Casio's slightly taller and wider.
- Casio has a fake carbon fiber pattern, TI 84 Plus CE has plain matte plastic in various colors.
- Neither calculator has a computer algebra system, limiting operations with letter variables.
- Casio provides exact answers, simplifying radicals and fractions, unlike TI 84 Plus CE.
- Both calculators offer functions like derivatives, integrals, and summations in a menu, with Casio's menu layout being more confusing.
- Casio is faster in internal calculations, evident in speed tests for integrals and sums.
- Casio graphs functions quicker than TI 84 Plus CE, with both offering maximum/minimum values and intersects.
- Both calculators can graph in different coordinate systems and share apps for spreadsheets, conic sections, tables, equation solvers, programming interfaces, financial functions, unit conversion, and periodic tables.
- Casio FX CG50 has a 3D graphing feature, absent in TI 84 Plus CE, allowing for graphing up to three functions and parametric 3D functions.
- Casio FX CG50 is a cheaper alternative with similar capabilities to TI 84 Plus CE, although less widely used.
