Astrology is Fraud? | Engr Muhammad ALi Mirza About Astrology & ILM e Najoom || Yasir Janjua Podcast

Yasir Janjua Podcast・2 minutes read

Astrologers connect astrology to science, using ultrasound and technology, but science rejects astrology due to its speculative nature and lack of consistent results. Science emphasizes the importance of observations and experiments for true scientific knowledge, unlike astrology's reliance on predictions based on stars and natural phenomena.

Insights

  • Astrologers use scientific tools like ultrasound but are not considered true scientists by the scientific community, which emphasizes the importance of observation and reproducibility in knowledge.
  • Science's emphasis on consistent, repeatable results contrasts with astrology's speculative nature, where predictions are not based on concrete observations but rather on interpretations of celestial phenomena.

Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free

Recent questions

  • How do astrologers make predictions?

    Astrologers claim to base their predictions on scientific knowledge, using ultrasound and technology to determine a person's traits. They refer to a Sura in the Quran, swearing on the stars and connecting natural phenomena to astrology. However, science rejects astrology as a true science, emphasizing the importance of observations and experiments in scientific knowledge.

  • Is astrology considered a true science?

    Science asserts that physical phenomena will consistently yield the same results, unlike astrology's predictions. Astrologers' predictions are deemed as speculation, not true science, as science demands definite knowledge based on observations. Science does not predict weather or future events with certainty, unlike astrology's claims.

  • What does science rely on for knowledge?

    Physical knowledge, such as ultrasound revealing details in the womb or underground water, is considered scientific, unlike astrology. Science relies on repeatable results, like petrol igniting fire consistently, contrasting with astrology's unpredictable predictions.

  • How does science view astrology's predictions?

    Science rejects astrology as a true science, emphasizing the importance of observations and experiments in scientific knowledge. Astrologers' predictions are deemed as speculation, not true science, as science demands definite knowledge based on observations.

  • Can astrology be trusted for accurate predictions?

    Science does not predict weather or future events with certainty, unlike astrology's claims. Astrologers' predictions are considered unreliable as they are not based on repeatable results or scientific evidence, unlike the principles of true science.

Related videos

Summary

00:00

Astrology vs Science: Predictions and Knowledge

  • Astrologers claim to base their predictions on scientific knowledge, using ultrasound and technology to determine a person's traits.
  • They refer to a Sura in the Quran, swearing on the stars and connecting natural phenomena to astrology.
  • Science rejects astrology as a true science, emphasizing the importance of observations and experiments in scientific knowledge.
  • Science asserts that physical phenomena will consistently yield the same results, unlike astrology's predictions.
  • Astrologers' predictions are deemed as speculation, not true science, as science demands definite knowledge based on observations.
  • Science does not predict weather or future events with certainty, unlike astrology's claims.
  • Physical knowledge, such as ultrasound revealing details in the womb or underground water, is considered scientific, unlike astrology.
  • Science relies on repeatable results, like petrol igniting fire consistently, contrasting with astrology's unpredictable predictions.
Channel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatarChannel avatar

Try it yourself — It’s free.