ANI Podcast with Smita Prakash | Episode 4 - Brand strategist Suhel Seth ANI News・53 minutes read
Suhail Seth discusses his upbringing, controversial nature, and views on cancel culture and media, emphasizing the importance of meritocracy and responsible platform usage. He addresses political, societal, and economic issues, advocating for transparency, accountability, and celebrating Indian heritage while highlighting challenges like nepotism and societal shifts towards materialism.
Insights Suhail Seth's upbringing in Calcutta instilled values of speaking out and challenging norms, emphasizing the importance of being interesting and articulate regardless of wealth or status. The discussion highlights the impact of social media as a leveling platform challenging traditional media, while also emphasizing the need for platform accountability to prevent incitement and fake news, advocating for responsible usage mechanisms. Get key ideas from YouTube videos. It’s free Summary 00:00
Suhail Seth: Outspoken Brand Strategist on Ani Podcast Suhail Seth, a brand strategist and writer, is the guest on the Ani podcast with Smitha Prakash. Seth is known for his outspoken nature and controversial statements on television debates. He refrains from discussing certain topics, like allegations against him, until the right time. Seth's upbringing in Calcutta instilled in him the values of speaking out and challenging the establishment. He emphasizes the importance of being interesting and articulate in Calcutta, regardless of wealth or status. Seth's grandfather had a significant role in a joint venture with Roche Pharmaceuticals. He was sent to boarding school during the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971. Seth's early exposure to theater in Calcutta shaped his outspoken nature and ability to challenge norms. Seth discusses the cancel culture and vocism prevalent in today's society, particularly in political and social spheres. He reflects on the changing dynamics of political and media landscapes post-2014, highlighting the shift towards meritocracy and away from entitlement. 15:37
"Media, Social Media, and Political Accountability" The only pan-national party is Arvind, who is considered a significant figure due to his wealth and control over two states, along with his media influence through advertising. The liberal media has been criticized for its irresponsible reporting, influenced by advertising money, leading to a lack of critical coverage. Social media has emerged as a leveling platform, challenging traditional media perceptions and providing a reality check on biases and elitism. Social media, while influential, represents only about two percent of the population, with concerns about anonymity leading to reckless behavior and the spread of fake news. Calls for platform accountability to prevent incitement and fake news, emphasizing the need for mechanisms to ensure responsible usage. The idea of Indian-ness and patriotism is discussed, highlighting the distinction between nationalism and patriotism, with a call to celebrate Indian heritage and values. The need for stringent electoral funding regulations, drawing comparisons with the UK's spending limits and advocating for transparent funding sources like the Tatas. Praise for the current government's clean cabinet and strict anti-corruption measures, instilling a fear of consequences for any wrongdoing. Criticism of political parties for excessive spending on elections, leading to the recovery of funds through various means, impacting the general public. The narrative shifts to the role of industrialists in politics, with a defense of successful entrepreneurs like Adani and Ambani, questioning the vilification of wealth creators and job providers. 31:15
Support for Tata Group, Modi's role questioned Diruma Ambani sought support from corporate India, particularly praising the Tata group under Chandra for their success. The discussion questions whether Modi supported the Tata group during the Cyrus Mistry case, emphasizing the independence of the judiciary in the matter. The delay in reforms due to political reasons is highlighted, with Gautama Madani's airport ownership cited as an example of political influence. The importance of succumbing to logic over blackmail is emphasized, warning against yielding to intellectual, monetary, or spiritual coercion. The text advocates for focusing on essential concerns like ensuring people have enough food rather than engaging in public discussions on religion. The text reflects on the life and health of Rakesh, a diabetic entrepreneur, emphasizing his philanthropy and disregard for personal health. The narrative praises Rakesh's optimism and commitment to India's entrepreneurial success, highlighting his belief in India's potential. Criticism is directed towards the government's handling of India's 75th anniversary celebrations, suggesting a missed opportunity for a more meaningful event. The text underscores the importance of celebrating India's diversity and contrarian thought, advocating for a focus on scholarship and ideas that shaped the nation. The discussion touches on nepotism in various fields, including Bollywood, politics, and bureaucracy, acknowledging its presence while emphasizing the need for merit-based outcomes. 47:00
"Social norms, money, and communication challenges" Social norms and behavior dictate our lives, with social acceptance being a key motivator. The shift from stature to money as a status symbol is evident in today's society. Linguistic skills and English proficiency are no longer sources of shame. Access and money are closely linked, with access being more attainable for those with wealth. Cultural differences in acceptance of behaviors, like drinking, are highlighted between Delhi and Bombay. Attire and societal norms have evolved, with confidence and financial success being prioritized. Matrimonial expectations have shifted towards salary figures rather than traditional professions. Materialism and social pressure are causing harm, with parenting being outsourced. Communication skills are lacking among the youth, impacting interactions and understanding. Journalism faces challenges of immediacy, pressure, and the influence of fact-checkers, impacting freedom of expression.